PolicyBrief
H.R. 960
119th CongressFeb 4th 2025
Protect Our Clothes from PFAS Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Protect Our Clothes from PFAS Act amends the Harmonized Tariff Schedule to remove specific water-resistance criteria that currently incentivize the use of PFAS in garment manufacturing.

Chellie Pingree
D

Chellie Pingree

Representative

ME-1

LEGISLATION

Protect Our Clothes from PFAS Act Strips Water-Resistant Standards from Federal Trade Guidelines

The Protect Our Clothes from PFAS Act executes a precision strike on the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS), the massive rulebook that determines how every imported item is classified and taxed. Specifically, Section 2 of the bill deletes a key sentence in Additional U.S. Note 2 to Chapter 62. This sentence currently serves as the legal 'yardstick' for what makes a garment 'water resistant'—a technical definition that relies on specific pressure tests to see if water leaks through the fabric. By removing this standard, the bill effectively changes the rulebook for how the government identifies water-repellent clothing at the border.

The Trade Classification Shift

In the world of international trade, words like 'water resistant' aren't just marketing—they determine the tariff rate a company pays when bringing goods into the country. Currently, for a jacket to be classified as water resistant under Chapter 62, it must pass a specific test where it resists water penetration under pressure. This bill removes that specific criteria. For a small business owner importing outdoor gear or a retail worker stocking shelves, this could eventually change which items are labeled as 'water resistant' and how much those items cost to bring to market. If the federal definition disappears, the industry might see a shift in how these products are taxed or regulated during the import process.

Why the Definition Matters

The 'PFAS' in the bill’s title refers to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, often called 'forever chemicals,' which have historically been used to make clothing shed water. While the bill text is short and focuses on the technicality of the Tariff Schedule, the move to strike the existing water-resistance definition suggests a decoupling of federal trade standards from current testing methods. For a construction worker buying a heavy-duty rain coat or a parent shopping for a toddler’s snowsuit, this change is a behind-the-scenes move that could influence the manufacturing standards of water-repellent gear. By removing the old definition, the bill clears the deck, potentially paving the way for new standards that don't rely on the traditional chemical-heavy testing benchmarks.