PolicyBrief
H.R. 9598
119th CongressJul 6th 2026
No Fencing at Lafayette Square Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill prohibits the use of federal, state, or private funds to install permanent fencing around Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C.

Eleanor Norton
D

Eleanor Norton

Representative

DC

LEGISLATION

No Fencing at Lafayette Square Act Prohibits Permanent Barriers at Historic DC Park

The No Fencing at Lafayette Square Act is a straightforward piece of legislation that draws a line in the sand—or rather, the grass—regarding public access to one of the country’s most iconic parks. The bill explicitly prohibits the use of any funds, whether they come from federal, state, private, or even foreign sources, to install permanent fencing around Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C. (Section 2). For anyone who has ever visited the capital or seen the White House on the news, this park is the seven-acre public space directly across from the President's front door. The bill ensures that the view and the access remain open to the public, rather than being walled off by new permanent structures.

Keeping the Gates Open

While the bill stops new permanent walls from going up, it isn’t a total ban on all fences. Under Section 2, the government is still allowed to repair or replace the fencing that already existed at the time the Act was signed. This means if you’re a tourist visiting D.C. or a local office worker grabbing lunch on a park bench, you won’t see the current landscape change into a fortress, but you also won't see the existing historical perimeter fall into disrepair. The bill defines the square precisely by its borders—H Street, Madison Place, Pennsylvania Avenue, and Jackson Place—to ensure there is no confusion about where the 'no-build' zone starts and ends.

Clear Borders and Bottom Lines

This legislation is particularly clear-cut, leaving very little room for bureaucratic interpretation. By banning the use of 'State' funds (which the bill defines to include D.C. and all U.S. territories) and even private donations for this specific purpose, it prevents any workaround that might allow for permanent enclosure. For the average citizen, this translates to a guarantee of continued access to a historic site without the risk of seeing public tax dollars—or large private grants—spent on permanent barriers that would fundamentally change the character of the space.