PolicyBrief
H.R. 9529
119th CongressJun 29th 2026
No Official Presidential Returns On Furtive Individual Trades Act
IN COMMITTEE

The NO PROFIT Act imposes a 100 percent tax on capital gains earned by a sitting President on any assets not held in a qualified blind trust.

Andrea Salinas
D

Andrea Salinas

Representative

OR-6

LEGISLATION

NO PROFIT Act Hits Presidents with 100% Tax on Stock Gains Outside Blind Trusts Starting 2025

The 'No Official Presidential Returns On Furtive Individual Trades Act'—or the NO PROFIT Act for short—is a bold move to ensure the Commander-in-Chief isn't padding their portfolio while running the country. Starting in 2025, any President who makes a profit selling stocks, bonds, or other assets that aren't tucked away in a 'qualified blind trust' will see 100% of those gains go straight to the IRS. Essentially, if they don't hand over the keys to their portfolio to an independent manager, they don't get to keep a single dime of the profit. This isn't just about actual sales, either; the bill includes a 'mark-to-market' rule, meaning every New Year's Eve, the President has to value their non-trust assets as if they sold them that day and pay tax on the growth. It’s a high-stakes 'use it or lose it' policy for financial transparency.

The 'Blind Trust' or Bust

Under Section 2 of the bill, the only way a President avoids this 100% tax is by moving their assets into a qualified blind trust. For a regular person, this is like giving your retirement account to a professional and telling them, 'Don't tell me what you're buying or selling, just make sure I don't go broke.' If a President holds onto a family business or a specific tech stock outside that trust, and that stock's value shoots up because of a new trade deal they signed, the government takes all the profit. The bill even includes rules to prevent 'double taxation,' so if they pay the 100% tax on a gain one year, they won't get hit again on that same amount later. It’s a mechanism designed to make personal profit from policy decisions financially impossible.

Paper Gains and Real-World Math

The 'Year-End Mark-to-Market' provision is where things get complicated. Imagine you own a piece of real estate that isn't in a trust; even if you don't sell it, if the market says it’s worth $100,000 more on December 31st than it was on January 1st, you owe the government $100,000 in tax right then and there. For a President with a complex portfolio, this could create a massive cash-flow problem. They might have to sell other assets just to pay the tax on growth they haven't actually cashed out yet. While this prevents a President from 'hiding' gains by simply never selling, it also means the administrative burden of being a wealthy President just got a lot heavier and more expensive.

High Stakes for the Highest Office

While the goal is to kill any incentive for insider trading at the highest level, the 100% tax rate is essentially a financial 'kill switch.' It doesn't just nudge a President toward ethics; it mandates a total separation from their personal wealth-building. The challenge lies in the 'qualified blind trust' definition itself—if the rules for what counts as 'blind' are too vague, we might just see a new era of creative accounting. For the average citizen, this bill means the person in the Oval Office has a massive financial incentive to focus on the national economy rather than their own brokerage account, but it also means the barrier to entry for anyone with a complex business background just became a whole lot steeper.