This bill establishes new grounds for revoking citizenship and immigration status, reviews past asylum and refugee grants, and mandates the repatriation of denaturalized individuals and their children.
Andrew Ogles
Representative
TN-5
The Remigration Act establishes new grounds for revoking citizenship and immigration status based on criminal activity, support for terrorism, or receipt of public benefits. It also restricts birthright citizenship, mandates a review of recent asylum and refugee grants, and increases English proficiency requirements for naturalization. Finally, the bill requires the repatriation of denaturalized individuals along with their dependent children.
The Remigration Act introduces a sweeping overhaul of how the U.S. grants and revokes legal status, creating several new pathways for the government to strip naturalized citizens of their status and deport long-term residents. The bill targets a wide range of behaviors—from serious crimes and terrorism support to the use of public benefits and even public speech—while also moving to end automatic birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. These changes would apply not just to future arrivals, but in many cases, to people who have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.
Under Section 2, the government would be required to revoke the citizenship of any naturalized person who commits certain crimes within ten years of taking their oath. This isn't just for high-level treason; it includes any 'aggravated felony' or fraud against a government program, such as a state benefits office. If a naturalized citizen is convicted of a felony related to administering or receiving benefits, they lose their status and face immediate removal. This effectively creates a decade-long 'probationary period' for new Americans where a single criminal conviction—which might result in probation for a natural-born citizen—results in exile for a naturalized one.
The bill takes a hard line on who qualifies for citizenship at birth and who gets to keep their Green Card. Section 3 specifies that children born in the U.S. are only 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the country—and thus citizens—if at least one parent is a citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or a service member. This would end the long-standing practice of granting citizenship to children of undocumented parents. Furthermore, Section 6 mandates the automatic revocation of Lawful Permanent Resident (Green Card) status for any immigrant who received means-tested public benefits (like SNAP or Medicaid) within the five years prior to the bill's enactment. For a family that fell on hard times and used a food pantry or state health insurance, this provision could trigger a sudden loss of legal standing.
One of the most subjective parts of the bill is Section 8, which makes non-citizens deportable for publicly espousing 'anti-American' beliefs or affiliations that the Secretary of Homeland Security deems a threat to public safety. Because 'anti-American' isn't strictly defined in the text, this gives the government broad discretion to target individuals for their political speech or social media activity. Additionally, Section 9 raises the bar for naturalization from 'ordinary usage' of English to 'functional literacy,' requiring a new standardized test. For a construction worker or a small business owner who speaks English well enough to work but struggles with formal testing, this could create a significant new barrier to becoming a citizen.
The bill also looks backward, establishing a task force in Section 4 to review every single asylum and refugee grant made between January 2021 and January 2025. If the task force finds that country conditions have changed or the original evidence wasn't 'credible,' those protections can be yanked away. Perhaps most significantly, Section 10 requires that if a parent loses their citizenship, their children—including those born in the U.S. who are citizens—must be 'repatriated' (deported) with them, unless the other parent is a U.S. citizen who can take custody. This moves away from standard judicial proceedings and into administrative adjudication, meaning many of these life-altering decisions would be made by USCIS officers rather than in a traditional courtroom.