The SAFER Health Act of 2026 prohibits the disclosure of pregnancy termination or loss information under HIPAA in legal proceedings and preempts conflicting state laws to strengthen privacy protections.
Sara Jacobs
Representative
CA-51
The SAFER Health Act of 2026 strengthens federal privacy protections for sensitive health information related to pregnancy termination or loss under HIPAA and HITECH. It prohibits the disclosure of this information in most legal proceedings without explicit authorization. The Act also clarifies that complying with these new privacy rules will not be considered "information blocking" under current health IT regulations. Finally, it preempts conflicting state laws, allowing only those state laws that offer stronger privacy safeguards.
The SAFER Health Act of 2026 creates a federal shield for sensitive reproductive health data, explicitly banning healthcare providers and insurance companies from handing over pregnancy termination or loss records in any legal proceeding without your written permission. This isn't just about abortion; the bill’s definition of 'pregnancy termination or loss information' under Section 2 covers everything from miscarriages and stillbirths to ectopic pregnancy treatments and even the simple act of asking for a referral. By updating HIPAA and HITECH Act standards, the bill ensures that your medical history can't be weaponized in civil, criminal, or administrative hearings unless you sign off on it first.
To make this work in the real world, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to overhaul health IT rules within 90 days. Under the new 'information blocking' revisions (45 CFR 171.202), a hospital or doctor’s office won't get in trouble for refusing to share your data with outside investigators or lawyers. Furthermore, health tech developers are now required to build 'data segregation' features into their software. Think of this like a digital safe-deposit box within your electronic health record; it allows providers to separate your reproductive history from the rest of your medical file so that a routine check-up record doesn't accidentally leak sensitive details about a past pregnancy loss.
There are two specific 'backdoors' where your consent isn't required: if a doctor needs the records to defend themselves in a malpractice lawsuit, or if an investigator is looking into physical harm done to you and you’re unable to speak for yourself due to death or incapacity. Outside of those narrow windows, federal law would now override any state laws that try to force the disclosure of this data. However, the bill leaves the door open for states to pass even stricter privacy laws if they choose. For the average person—whether you’re a professional managing a busy office or a trade worker—this means your private medical moments stay between you and your doctor, regardless of the legal climate in your specific zip code.