PolicyBrief
H.R. 936
119th CongressFeb 4th 2025
Medicaid Improvement and State Flexibility Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Medicaid Improvement and State Flexibility Act of 2025 empowers states to independently approve and implement Medicaid demonstration projects featuring EBT-based primary care funding, catastrophic coverage, and federal budget neutrality.

Mark Green
R

Mark Green

Representative

TN-7

LEGISLATION

Medicaid Overhaul Grants States Power to Replace Traditional Coverage with EBT Cards and Cash Payouts

The Medicaid Improvement and State Flexibility Act of 2025 fundamentally changes how states can manage Medicaid by allowing them to bypass federal approval for major experimental projects. Under Section 2, states can now self-approve programs that replace traditional insurance with a yearly allowance loaded onto an electronic benefits transfer (EBT) card. This money is earmarked for primary care and medications, but there is a unique twist: if you don’t spend all the money on your card by the end of the year, the state pays you the remaining balance in cash. To cover major emergencies, the state would also enroll you in a 'catastrophic' insurance plan of its choosing.

The Health Savings Gamble

This bill shifts Medicaid toward a high-deductible model where you manage your own healthcare budget. For a gig worker or a young professional on Medicaid, the prospect of a year-end cash bonus for staying healthy sounds like a win. However, the bill relies on states to define what an 'appropriate' amount of money for that EBT card is and what qualifies as 'appropriate' catastrophic insurance (Section 2). This creates a real-world risk: if a state sets the EBT amount too low, a parent might find themselves choosing between taking a sick child to a doctor now or saving that balance for a rent payment later. Because the bill removes the standard five-year limit on these experiments, a state could keep a low-funding model in place indefinitely without federal intervention.

Coverage Gaps and Safety Nets

While the bill requires a catastrophic insurance backup, it doesn't specify exactly what that insurance must cover—only that it kicks in for services not on the EBT card or when the card runs out. This means the 'fine print' of what your state considers a medical emergency becomes incredibly important. For example, a construction worker who suffers a chronic injury might find that their EBT funds are drained by physical therapy in three months, leaving them to navigate a state-selected insurance plan that may or may not cover the specialized care they need for the rest of the year. Additionally, Section 2 explicitly prohibits these state-run projects from funding or covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother, creating a significant shift in reproductive healthcare access for millions of enrollees.

State Control and the Bottom Line

The legislation gives states the keys to the kingdom by letting them act as their own regulators. Usually, the federal government has to sign off on these 'Section 1115' waivers to ensure they don't hurt patients, but this bill lets states approve their own renewals. The only major federal leash is a requirement that the program doesn't cost the federal government more than the traditional Medicaid system would have. This creates a potential incentive for states to prioritize cost-cutting and 'budget neutrality' over the actual quality of care provided to residents. For the average person, this means your healthcare experience could look drastically different just by crossing a state line, with very little federal oversight to ensure the 'catastrophic' plan actually catches you when you fall.