This act increases the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit for qualified projects near public transit and mandates a HUD study on adjusting credit allocations based on geographic cost-of-living differences.
Ed Case
Representative
HI-1
The Transit Oriented Development Act of 2026 aims to boost the construction of affordable housing near public transit by significantly increasing the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit for qualifying projects in designated transit-oriented areas. This legislation defines these areas as being within a half-mile of transit stations and zoned for density. Additionally, the bill mandates a HUD study to recommend adjustments to state tax credit allocations based on geographic cost-of-living differences.
The Transit Oriented Development Act of 2026 aims to solve two of the biggest drains on your bank account simultaneously: rent and commuting. By amending the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the bill offers a massive financial carrot to developers who build affordable housing within a half-mile of rail, bus, harbor, or waterway stations. Specifically, Section 2 allows these projects to increase their 'eligible basis'—the amount used to calculate their tax credit—to 150 percent of the standard rate. If you live in Alaska, Hawaii, or a U.S. territory, that boost jumps even higher to 155 percent. The goal is to make it financially irresistible for builders to put apartments in places where residents can ditch their cars and hop on a train or bus.
To qualify for this 'transit boost,' a building must be located in a designated transit-oriented development area. Under Section 2, these areas are jointly picked by HUD and state housing agencies, but they have to meet strict criteria: they must be within a half-mile of a transit station and already be zoned for high-density development. For a retail worker or a young professional, this could mean the difference between a two-hour multi-bus commute and a ten-minute walk to a train station. However, there is a cap—these designated areas can’t cover more than 20 percent of a metropolitan area's population. This means the government is being selective, focusing the extra cash on the most strategic hubs rather than painting the whole city with a broad brush.
While the bill is generous, it isn't a free-for-all. Section 2 includes a 'coordination' rule that prevents developers from double-dipping. If a building is already getting a boost because it's in a 'high-cost area' (where construction is naturally more expensive), it has to choose one or the other. It can’t stack the transit boost on top of the high-cost boost. This keeps the program focused on its specific mission—transit access—without letting the tax credits spiral out of control. For developers, this means a math problem: is the transit location valuable enough to forgo other incentives?
Beyond just building new apartments, Section 3 of the bill looks at the bigger picture of how expensive life has become. It tasks the Secretary of HUD with conducting a massive study on geographic cost-of-living differences, specifically looking at how much people spend on housing and transportation. Within a year, HUD has to report back with a new formula for how tax credits are distributed to states. If you live in a city where a 'cheap' apartment still costs half your paycheck, this study is the first step toward the government acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all approach to housing credits doesn't work for modern workers.