This Act mandates that group health plans receive broad, timely access to claims data, payment information, and pricing terms from network service providers, while strengthening attestation requirements and imposing penalties for non-compliance.
Robert Onder
Representative
MO-3
The Health Data Access, Transparency, and Affordability Act of 2026 significantly increases the required access group health plans have to claims data, payment information, and pricing terms from their network service providers. It voids contract clauses that restrict this data access and strengthens requirements for annual attestations regarding price and quality information. The bill establishes civil penalties for non-compliance and mandates specific electronic formats for data delivery.
This bill is a direct strike against the 'black box' of healthcare pricing. It amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to force service providers—like insurance companies and pharmacy benefit managers—to hand over detailed claims data and pricing formulas to the employers who actually pay for the plans. Under this legislation, contracts cannot limit data access beyond 15 days, and any 'gag clauses' that prevent an employer from seeing exactly how their money is being spent are legally void. It also backs these rules with teeth, allowing for civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day for entities that refuse to share the data.
Think of your company’s health plan like a massive grocery bill where you’re only allowed to see the total at the bottom, not the price of the milk or the eggs. This bill changes that by requiring 'network service providers' to provide unmodified electronic files of every claim and payment notice. This means if you work in HR or run a small business, you would finally have the right to see the itemized costs for everything from ER visits to prescription drug markups. By mandating standard electronic formats (like ASC X12N 837), the bill ensures that the data isn't just shared, but is actually readable and useful for spotting overcharges or fraud.
For the average office worker or trade professional, this isn't just about paperwork; it’s about your monthly premiums and deductibles. When your employer can’t see the 'extra-contractual terms' or pricing methodologies used by their insurance carrier, they can’t negotiate for a better deal. For example, if a Third Party Administrator (TPA) is charging hidden 'repricing fees' every time a claim is processed, those costs eventually get passed down to you in the form of higher payroll deductions. This bill requires all non-claim costs to be itemized and available in real-time through a web portal, making it much harder for middlemen to skim off the top without anyone noticing.
While the bill is a major win for transparency, it does include a 'get out of jail' card that bears watching. If a plan sponsor can’t get the data, they can file a written statement explaining why and naming the entity that blocked them. While this is meant to protect employers from being penalized for a provider’s stubbornness, it could create a bureaucratic paper trail that delays actual transparency. On the privacy front, the bill is clear: all this data sharing must still follow HIPAA rules. This means that while your employer gets the 'what' and 'how much' of the claims, your personal health information remains protected under existing federal privacy standards.