PolicyBrief
H.R. 9155
119th CongressJun 4th 2026
CONSENT Act
IN COMMITTEE

The CONSENT Act establishes a federal civil remedy for individuals who receive unsolicited intimate visual depictions transmitted without their consent.

Jennifer McClellan
D

Jennifer McClellan

Representative

VA-4

LEGISLATION

New CONSENT Act Targets Unsolicited 'Cyber-Flashing' with $1,000 Federal Lawsuits

The CONSENT Act creates a federal legal pathway for anyone who receives unwanted intimate images or videos—commonly known as 'cyber-flashing'—to sue the sender. Under this bill, if someone knowingly or recklessly sends you an explicit image or an AI-generated 'deepfake' without your permission, you can take them to U.S. district court. The legislation defines consent as a 'conscious and voluntary authorization' that isn't forced or coerced, making it clear that just because you're on a dating app or in a conversation doesn't mean you've signed up for unsolicited nudes. It specifically targets direct transmissions rather than public posts, focusing on the digital equivalent of someone exposing themselves to you in person.

Digital Boundaries and Deepfakes

This bill doesn't just cover traditional photos; it explicitly includes 'intimate digital forgeries,' or deepfakes. This means if someone uses AI software to make it look like you or someone else is in an explicit video and sends it to you without your okay, they are on the hook. For a regular office worker or a student, this provides a much-needed tool to fight back against digital harassment that previously fell into a legal gray area. The bill sets statutory damages at up to $1,000 per violation (Section 2), or you can sue for compensatory damages if the emotional distress caused is significant. It also allows judges to issue restraining orders to stop a sender from hitting 'send' ever again.

Privacy for Minors and Real-World Recourse

Recognizing that these incidents can be incredibly sensitive, the bill allows minor plaintiffs to use initials or pseudonyms in all court filings to protect their identity (Section 2). If the recipient is under 18, a parent or guardian can file the lawsuit on their behalf. This is a big deal for parents concerned about their kids' safety on social media and messaging apps. To keep things fair, the bill carves out exceptions for 'good faith' medical, educational, or law enforcement purposes—so a doctor sending a medical image for a diagnosis or a detective processing evidence wouldn't be sued under this law.

The Cost of Pressing Send

For the average person, this bill turns a frustrating and often traumatic experience into an actionable offense. Instead of just blocking a harasser and moving on, victims can now hold senders financially accountable for their behavior. While it doesn't replace criminal laws, it adds a civil layer of protection that hits harassers in the wallet. The bill also includes a 'severability' clause, meaning if one part of the law is challenged in court, the rest of the protections stay in place. It’s a straightforward attempt to bring digital etiquette into the federal legal system, ensuring that 'no'—or the absence of a 'yes'—is respected in every inbox.