This act prohibits the federal government from mandating that qualified health plans maintain a provider network, while requiring greater transparency from plans that choose not to have one.
Michael Rulli
Representative
OH-6
The Patient Choice and Access Act of 2026 removes the requirement for qualified health plans to maintain a provider network to be certified on the health insurance exchange. This change allows plans to operate without established networks starting in 2027. Plans choosing not to use a network must provide clear disclosures about potential out-of-pocket costs and balance billing to consumers.
Starting January 1, 2027, the Patient Choice and Access Act of 2026 fundamentally changes how some health insurance plans operate by removing the requirement for them to maintain a traditional 'provider network.' Under this bill, the Department of Health and Human Services can no longer deny certification to a plan just because it doesn't have a pre-negotiated list of doctors and hospitals. Instead, these 'network-free' plans will be allowed on the health exchange as long as they provide clear disclosures about potential costs and offer tools to help you find doctors willing to accept their payment rates.
For decades, we’ve been trained to check if a doctor is 'in-network' to avoid massive bills. This bill flips that script. By amending the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, specifically section 1311, it allows insurers to ditch the administrative headache of managing networks entirely. In theory, this could lower your monthly premiums because the insurance company isn't spending money contracting with thousands of providers. For a freelance graphic designer or a small shop owner, a lower monthly bill sounds great—until you actually need to see a specialist. Without a network, the 'guaranteed' rate is gone, and you might find yourself negotiating your own medical bills at the reception desk.
The bill introduces a transparency requirement in Section 2, forcing plans without networks to use 'plain language' to explain out-of-pocket costs and the risk of balance billing. Balance billing happens when your insurance pays what they think is fair—say, $100 for a check-up—but the doctor charges $250. In a network-free plan, you are on the hook for that $150 difference. Imagine a construction worker who needs physical therapy; under this bill, they might choose a cheaper plan but end up paying hundreds extra every month because no local therapist accepts the 'benefit amount' as full payment. The bill requires plans to provide 'adequate customer service' to help you find providers who won't overcharge you, but it doesn't define what 'adequate' actually looks like in practice.
To make this work, the legislation mandates that these plans offer online search tools to help enrollees find providers who will accept the plan's payment as full settlement. This is a tall order. If you’re a parent with a sick kid at 2:00 AM, you’ll be relying on an app to tell you which urgent care center won't send you a surprise bill three weeks later. The real-world challenge is that doctors aren't required by this bill to accept those rates. While the bill aims to increase 'choice' by letting you see anyone, the practical reality is that your 'choice' is limited by your bank account if the doctor decides your insurance's payment is too low. It shifts the burden of cost-control from the insurance company's negotiators directly onto your shoulders.