PolicyBrief
H.R. 9069
119th CongressMay 29th 2026
Keeping Immigrants and Destinations Safe Act
IN COMMITTEE

This Act prohibits immigration enforcement actions near sensitive locations and restricts the detention of children, individuals with cognitive disabilities, and their primary caregivers, with exceptions for criminal warrants.

Joe Neguse
D

Joe Neguse

Representative

CO-2

LEGISLATION

KIDS Act Bans Immigration Enforcement Near Schools, Hospitals, and Places of Worship with 1,000-Foot Safety Zones

The Keeping Immigrants and Destinations Safe Act (KIDS Act) creates a massive shift in how immigration enforcement works on the ground. It effectively draws a 1,000-foot 'no-go' circle around a long list of community hubs—places like schools, hospitals, churches, and even school bus stops. Beyond just mapping out where officers can’t go, the bill strictly prohibits detaining children, people with cognitive disabilities, and their primary caregivers, unless there’s a specific criminal warrant involved. If someone is picked up in violation of these rules, the bill says the evidence gathered can’t be used against them in court, and they must be prioritized for release to a guardian or protective services.

Safe Zones and the 1,000-Foot Rule

Think of this as a major expansion of 'sensitive locations.' The bill lists everything from the obvious—like your local ER or a preschool—to the everyday, like public libraries, DMVs, and even the sidewalk where the school bus drops off your kids. For a parent who is a noncitizen, this means they could drop their child at a 4th-grade field trip or visit a community health clinic for a flu shot without the immediate fear of an enforcement action happening on-site. The catch is the '1,000-foot' rule; because many of these locations are packed together in cities, large swaths of urban neighborhoods could technically become enforcement-free zones. However, the bill is clear: if an officer has a criminal arrest warrant signed by a judge, these location-based protections disappear instantly.

Keeping Families Together

The bill changes the math for detention by creating a 'strong presumption' that primary caregivers shouldn't be locked up. In plain English, if a parent is the main provider for a child or someone with a cognitive disability (like a severe mental impairment that affects learning or communication), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has to prove with 'clear and convincing evidence' why releasing them is a bad idea. For a family where one parent works construction and the other manages the household, this provision aims to prevent the sudden 'disappearance' of a caregiver into the detention system. DHS is also required to honor legal paperwork, like a power of attorney, that lets a parent temporarily hand over care to a trusted friend or relative if they are taken into custody.

The 'Catch-All' and Implementation Hurdles

While the bill is specific about schools and hospitals, it includes a 'catch-all' phrase that lets the Secretary of Homeland Security designate 'any other location' as a sensitive site. This is where things get a bit blurry. Depending on who is in charge, that list could grow to include almost anywhere, or it could be interpreted narrowly, leaving people guessing where the boundaries actually are. For DHS officers, this creates a complex map to navigate; an enforcement action that starts on a street corner might become illegal if it moves within 1,000 feet of a hidden 'workforce training site' or a domestic violence shelter. If they get it wrong, the bill allows the person detained to file a motion to terminate their deportation case entirely, making the stakes for procedural errors incredibly high.