The "RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act" mandates the U.S. government to officially recognize and refer to the territories of the "West Bank" as "Judea and Samaria" in all official documents and communications, while also amending existing laws to reflect this change.
Claudia Tenney
Representative
NY-24
The "RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act" seeks to officially recognize areas annexed by Israel from Jordan during the Six-Day War as Judea and Samaria. It prohibits the use of federal funds for documents referring to this region as the "West Bank," and amends existing laws to reflect this change, with a waiver option for the Secretary of State under certain conditions. This bill aims to change how the U.S. government refers to these territories in all official documents and communications.
The "RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria Act" is a proposed law that changes how the U.S. government talks about a specific, highly contested region. Instead of using the term "West Bank," which is common in international discussions, the bill mandates the use of "Judea and Samaria" in all official U.S. documents and communications. This shift aligns U.S. terminology with that used by the Israeli government, and it's a significant change with potential real-world consequences.
The core of the bill (Section 2) is about changing the official name used by the U.S. government for the area Israel annexed from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. The bill states that Congress believes the U.S. should call this area "Judea and Samaria," dividing it into "Judea" (south of Jerusalem) and "Samaria" (north of Jerusalem). The bill also directs the government to stop using "West Bank" in official documents.
Section 3 of the bill puts teeth into this name change. It prohibits using any government funds to create documents or communications that refer to the area as the "West Bank." Think maps, reports, press releases – anything official. There's a loophole, though: this doesn't apply to international treaties or agreements. And, the Secretary of State can waive this rule if it's deemed in the "interest of the United States," but they have to explain why to Congress within 30 days.
For example, if a State Department report on regional agriculture previously mentioned "West Bank farmers," it would now have to say "Judea and Samaria farmers." Or, if a USAID project funded infrastructure in the area, any related documents would need to use the new terminology.
Section 4 goes through a bunch of existing U.S. laws and swaps out "West Bank" for "Judea and Samaria." These laws cover a range of topics, including foreign assistance (Foreign Assistance Act of 1961), terrorism (Taylor Force Act), and peace initiatives (Nita M. Lowey Middle East Partnership for Peace Act). This is where the bill's impact goes beyond just words – it changes the language in laws that deal with real-world actions and funding.
This seemingly simple name change has big implications. The term "West Bank" is widely used internationally, while "Judea and Samaria" is the term preferred by the Israeli government. By changing its official terminology, the U.S. is potentially shifting its perceived stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It could be seen as the U.S. taking a side, which could complicate diplomatic efforts in the region and impact relationships with other countries. And the Secretary of State's ability to waive the rule introduces the possibility of selective enforcement, depending on political priorities.