Housing Agencies Get More Flexibility: 'Deliver Housing Now Act of 2025' Removes Cap on 'Moving to Work' Program

The 'Deliver Housing Now Act of 2025' makes a significant change to how some public housing programs operate. The bill eliminates the previous limit on the number of public housing agencies (PHAs) that can join the 'Moving to Work' (MTW) demonstration program. Instead of a maximum of 30 agencies, the law now sets a minimum of 15 participating agencies (SEC. 2).

Shaking Up the System

The core change here is about flexibility. The MTW program, established in 1996, lets participating PHAs try out new ways to manage their housing assistance. Think of it like a testing ground for different approaches to rent rules, funding use, and program requirements. Normally, PHAs have to follow a strict set of rules from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). MTW agencies get waivers from some of those rules, allowing them to tailor programs to their local needs. This bill opens that flexibility to potentially many more agencies.

Real-World Ripple Effects

What does this mean on the ground? Imagine a small-town PHA struggling with outdated federal rules that don't fit its specific housing market. Under MTW, they might be able to streamline their application process, making it easier for people to get housing assistance. Or, a city PHA could use MTW flexibility to create a new program that helps residents find jobs and become more self-sufficient. For example, instead of a one-size-fits-all rent calculation, an agency might develop a system that better accounts for a family's unique circumstances, like childcare costs or unexpected medical bills.

Potential Pitfalls

While the bill aims to boost innovation, it's not without potential drawbacks. The MTW program has faced criticism in the past for a lack of transparency in how some agencies operate and use their funds. Expanding the program without adding new oversight measures could amplify those concerns. It's also possible that we'll see inconsistencies across the country. Some PHAs might use their new flexibility to create really effective programs, while others might struggle, leading to unequal access to quality housing assistance depending on where you live. It's like giving different chefs the same ingredients but letting them use any recipe they want – some dishes will be amazing, others, not so much. The challenge will be making sure all participating agencies are held accountable for results and that the program benefits residents, not just the agencies themselves.