PolicyBrief
H.R. 885
119th CongressJan 31st 2025
Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act" mandates the Secretary of State to report to Congress on designating specific Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, and to designate those that meet the criteria as such within 30 days of the report. This act does not expand asylum eligibility based on these designations.

Chip Roy
R

Chip Roy

Representative

TX-21

LEGISLATION

Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act: New Bill Forces U.S. to Label Cartels as Terrorists

The "Drug Cartel Terrorist Designation Act" is a new bill that pushes the U.S. government to officially label major Mexican drug cartels, including the Gulf Cartel, Cartel Del Noreste, Cartel de Sinaloa, and Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion, as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). The bill mandates the Secretary of State to report to Congress within 30 days of the bill's enactment, detailing whether these cartels meet the criteria for FTO designation. If they do, the Secretary must designate them as terrorists within another 30 days (SEC. 2).

Fast Track to Terrorist Designation

This bill puts the cartel designation process on a fast track. The Secretary of State has to quickly assess and report on whether these cartels fit the legal definition of a terrorist group. This isn't just paperwork; it triggers a mandatory designation if the criteria are met. This could shift how the U.S. deals with these groups, potentially opening the door to using counter-terrorism strategies and resources against them. The report, while unclassified and electronic for easy access, can include a classified section for sensitive details, ensuring that certain information remains confidential (SEC. 2).

Real-World Fallout: Beyond the Border

While the bill focuses on cartels, the "terrorist" label could have broader implications. For one, it could change the dynamics of U.S.-Mexico relations, potentially straining cooperation on other issues. It also raises questions about how we define "terrorism." While cartels are undeniably violent and dangerous, equating them with groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda could broaden the scope of what's considered terrorism, with potential long-term consequences for policy and even military actions. Importantly, the bill explicitly states that this designation won't make it easier for people fleeing cartel violence to get asylum in the U.S. (SEC. 2) – a critical point for those caught in the crossfire.

The Bigger Picture: Security and Unintended Consequences

The bill is presented as a national security measure, but the "terrorist" designation could have unintended consequences. While the goal might be to weaken cartels, it could also lead to more aggressive tactics that impact civilians and complicate diplomatic efforts. The mandatory nature of the designation, and the speed with which it must be implemented, leaves little room for nuanced consideration of these potential ripple effects. It's a blunt instrument being applied to a complex problem, and it's not yet clear if it will actually hit the intended target without causing significant collateral damage.