PolicyBrief
H.R. 8735
119th CongressMay 12th 2026
American Sovereignty and Monterey Historic Military Site Study Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates a study on the national significance and suitability of Monterey's Lower Presidio Historic Park for designation as a National Historic Park.

Jimmy Panetta
D

Jimmy Panetta

Representative

CA-19

LEGISLATION

Monterey's Hidden History: New Bill Eyes 3-Year National Park Study for Lower Presidio

The American Sovereignty and Monterey Historic Military Site Study Act kicks off a formal process to determine if the Lower Presidio Historic Park in Monterey, California, should join the National Park System. Under Section 4 of the bill, the Secretary of the Interior is required to launch a comprehensive "special resource study" to see if this 12,000-year-old site meets the high bar for national significance and federal management. This isn't just a quick walk-through; the bill mandates a deep dive into the costs of acquisition and maintenance, with a hard deadline for a report to Congress within three years of the study being funded.

A Deep Dive into California’s DNA

The study area isn't just a scenic hill; it’s a site that has seen everything from the earliest abalone fisheries of the Esselen and Rumsen peoples to the first raising of the American flag in California in 1846. Section 2 of the bill highlights that the site housed the legendary Buffalo Soldiers and currently hosts the Defense Language Institute, where military personnel learn critical languages for national security. If you’re a local resident or a history buff, this study is the first step toward potentially turning a leased city park into a federally protected landmark. The bill specifically requires the Secretary to consult with Tribal leaders and local governments to ensure the site’s layered history—from Spanish mass in 1770 to the 1924 oil fires—is fully documented.

Counting the Cost of Preservation

While the bill doesn't officially create a park yet, it sets the stage for what that would look like for taxpayers and the local community. Section 4(b) requires a detailed estimate of what it would cost the federal government to buy, develop, and operate the site. For the average person, this means the government is doing its homework on the front end to see if the site is "feasible" to manage. It also looks at alternatives, such as keeping the land under state or private control, ensuring that a National Park designation is actually the best move for the land and the budget. You can think of this as the ultimate "inspection period" before the federal government decides to commit to a long-term lease on a massive piece of California history.