PolicyBrief
H.R. 8686
119th CongressMay 7th 2026
To amend the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 to withdraw and reserve certain public land in the vicinity of Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill amends the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 to withdraw and reserve approximately 21,783 acres of federal land near Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, indefinitely for military readiness purposes while allowing for compatible non-defense uses.

Paul Gosar
R

Paul Gosar

Representative

AZ-9

LEGISLATION

Yuma Proving Ground Expansion: 21,782 Acres Withdrawn for Military Use, Limiting Public Access

Alright, let's talk about some federal land in Arizona that's getting a new job description. This bill, an amendment to the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013, basically carves out a significant chunk of land—we're talking about 21,782.981 acres, to be exact—right next to the Yuma Proving Ground. Think of it like the military needing more room to operate, so they're officially reserving this land for their use.

More Room for Uncle Sam

So, what does this mean for that land? Well, it's getting pulled out of the public domain. That means no more new mining claims, no more homesteading, and generally, it's not up for grabs under typical public land laws. This specific area, dubbed the "Highway 95 Withdrawal Area," along with a smaller "Howard Cantonment Withdrawal Area" of about 249 acres, is now officially earmarked for military purposes, just like it was hinted at way back in 1952. The big takeaway here is that the military gets to use this land indefinitely, or until they decide they don't need it anymore.

Sharing the Sandbox (with Rules)

Now, even though the Army is the primary user, the Secretary of the Interior—that's the folks who usually manage our national parks and public lands—will still be overseeing it. They can allow for things like wildlife conservation, protecting cultural sites, managing wild horses, and even some recreation like hunting. But here's the catch: all these non-military activities are strictly conditional. If the Army says it interferes with their operations, the non-military use is out. So, if you're a hunter or just someone who enjoys the outdoors, your access to these specific acres might become a lot more restricted or even disappear, depending on what the Army needs to do there.

Who's Calling the Shots?

When it comes to leases, easements, or permits—say, if a company wants to run a pipeline or power line across this land—the Secretary of the Interior is still the one to issue them. However, they absolutely need the Army's stamp of approval first, and the Army can tack on whatever conditions they deem necessary. This gives the military a pretty strong hand in controlling what happens on this land. There's one exception: a specific "Parker-Blaisdell Utility Corridor." For critical regional utility infrastructure, like those big transmission lines, the Secretary of the Interior can issue rights-of-way there without the Army's direct consent. They still have to talk to the Army to minimize impacts, but it's a bit more streamlined for essential services. This means your power company might have an easier time upgrading infrastructure in that specific zone, but for pretty much everything else, the Army's word is law.

The Long Haul

This isn't a temporary thing. The bill states this withdrawal is for an "indefinite period." That means this land is essentially off-limits for non-military development or broad public access for the foreseeable future. For folks who rely on these lands for recreation or even potential economic opportunities like mineral exploration, this is a pretty permanent shift. The State of Arizona also has about 800 acres of subsurface estate within the Highway 95 area, but the bill doesn't change their ownership, just how the surface is managed. So, while the military gains a critical piece of land for readiness, it comes at the cost of public access and potential future development for a significant chunk of federal land.