This bill mandates a study of national security risks posed by internet routers and modems supplied by companies linked to covered foreign countries.
Robert Latta
Representative
OH-5
The ROUTERS Act mandates a study by the Secretary of Commerce to assess the national security risks and cybersecurity weaknesses associated with consumer routers and modems supplied by companies connected to "covered countries." The resulting report, detailing these vulnerabilities, must be submitted to key Congressional committees within one year of enactment. This legislation aims to identify and address potential threats posed by insecure internet equipment.
The aptly named Removing Our Unsecure Technologies to Ensure Reliability and Security Act, or ROUTERS Act, isn't changing your Wi-Fi password today, but it is kicking off a serious, year-long federal investigation into the modems and routers sitting in millions of homes and offices. This legislation mandates the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a detailed study on the national security risks and cybersecurity weaknesses posed by consumer internet equipment—specifically, devices manufactured or supplied by companies connected to or influenced by a “covered country.”
This isn't just a casual look; it’s a focused deep dive. The Secretary of Commerce, working through the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, must specifically analyze gear—routers, modems, or combo units—that come from manufacturers tied to certain foreign governments (Section 2). Think of it this way: the government is essentially auditing the hardware that connects your laptop, smart TV, and security cameras to the internet, checking for backdoors or vulnerabilities that could be exploited by foreign adversaries. They have exactly one year from the law’s enactment to complete this review and report their findings to key committees in the House and Senate.
For the average person, a router is just the blinking box that makes Netflix work. But this bill highlights that this box is also a critical piece of infrastructure. If a router has a built-in security flaw or is designed to allow external access, it could compromise the data of anyone using it—from a small business processing credit cards to someone working from home on sensitive company files. The study aims to quantify this risk, especially when the hardware originates from a country the U.S. government views as a potential threat.
One crucial element is the definition of who they’re looking at. The bill doesn't name names directly but instead defines “covered country” by referencing an existing section of the U.S. Code (Section 4872(f)(2) of title 10). This reliance on external statute provides a clear, established list, but it also means the scope of the study—particularly which manufacturers are considered “controlled by, or influenced by” these countries—could be quite broad. This is where the rubber meets the road for manufacturers and suppliers of networking equipment who might face intense scrutiny and potential future regulatory action based on the study’s findings.
It’s important to remember that the ROUTERS Act only mandates a study; it doesn't ban any equipment or require you to replace your existing setup. The main benefit here is informational: Congress will receive a formal assessment of a major, often overlooked cybersecurity vulnerability. This report will serve as the foundation for future policy decisions. If the study reveals significant, widespread risks, we could see subsequent legislation that affects what kind of networking gear is allowed to be sold in the U.S., potentially leading to changes in the consumer electronics market down the line. For now, the Commerce Department is just getting its toolbox ready for the audit.