The Freedom to Cooperate Act mandates state and local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement by preempting sanctuary policies and establishing clear protocols and legal protections for honoring ICE detainers.
Kevin Kiley
Representative
CA-3
The Freedom to Cooperate Act mandates that state and local jurisdictions fully cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, effectively preempting "sanctuary" policies that restrict such collaboration. The bill also clarifies and expands the authority of the Department of Homeland Security to issue immigration detainers for individuals in local custody. Additionally, it provides legal immunity to state and local entities that comply with federal detainer requests, while ensuring protections for crime victims and witnesses.
The Freedom to Cooperate Act is a significant piece of legislation designed to dismantle state-level 'sanctuary' policies by requiring local law enforcement to work directly with federal immigration authorities. Specifically, Section 2 of the bill prohibits any state or local government from restricting officials from cooperating with immigration enforcement or sharing information about an individual’s status. This effectively nullifies local laws in cities or states that currently limit how much their police can help Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). While the bill includes a provision stating that police aren't required to arrest crime victims or witnesses, the broader mandate for cooperation could fundamentally change how local police departments operate in immigrant communities.
Under this bill, the federal government takes the driver's seat on immigration enforcement, regardless of what local voters or state legislatures have decided. For a local police officer, this means they can no longer be barred by state law from asking about someone's immigration status or notifying the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) when they encounter someone they suspect is deportable. For a small business owner or a construction worker in a community with a high immigrant population, this could mean a noticeable shift in how local police interact with the public. The bill specifically protects the right of officials to ask questions, notify the feds, and respond to information requests, which might make some residents more hesitant to call 911 for help if they fear their status—or a family member's—will be flagged.
Section 3 of the bill gives the Secretary of Homeland Security broader authority to issue 'detainers'—requests for local jails to hold someone for up to 48 to 96 hours after they would have otherwise been released. Previously, these were often reserved for more serious offenses, but this bill allows a detainer for anyone arrested for any violation of criminal or motor vehicle law. This means a simple traffic stop that leads to a brief arrest could result in a multi-day federal hold if DHS has 'probable cause' to believe the person is deportable. The bill defines probable cause quite broadly, including matches in federal databases or 'voluntary statements' made by the individual, which could lead to mistakes or detentions based on outdated paperwork.
One of the most tactical moves in this bill is the 'immunity' provision for local governments. If a local jail complies with a federal detainer and holds someone, and that person later sues for wrongful detention, the local government is held 'harmless.' Instead, the lawsuit must name the United States government as the defendant. By removing the financial and legal risk for local municipalities, the bill incentivizes local jails to comply with ICE requests without worrying about their own budgets. While this protects local taxpayers from legal fees, it also reduces the incentive for local oversight, as the federal government becomes the sole party responsible for any potential civil rights violations occurring during that transfer window.