The "BLOCK Act" repeals several federal education grant programs and replaces them with block grants to states, matching the funding they received in fiscal year 2025.
Tim Burchett
Representative
TN-2
The BLOCK Act repeals several Elementary and Secondary Education Act grant programs, replacing them with block grants to states starting in fiscal year 2026. The amount of the block grants will match the amount the state received in fiscal year 2025 under the repealed programs. This change aims to provide states with more flexibility in using federal education funds. "State" is defined as the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
The "Building Lasting Opportunities for Community K12 Act," or BLOCK Act, fundamentally reshapes how federal money flows to K-12 education. Instead of targeted grants for specific programs, it sends a single block grant to each state (including D.C. and Puerto Rico, per Section 4). Think of it as the feds handing states a lump sum and saying, "You figure it out."
The core of the BLOCK Act is a swap: numerous existing federal education grants get consolidated into one big block grant for each state. Section 2 lays it out: starting in fiscal year 2026, each state gets a chunk of money. Initially, it's equal to what they received in 2025 combined across all the programs being replaced. But here's the catch – Congress can change that amount in any future year. So, while states get the same money initially, there's no guarantee it'll stay that way.
What does this mean on the ground? Imagine a school district that currently relies on several federal grants: one for supporting low-income students (Title I-A), another for English language learners (Title III-A), and a third for after-school programs (Title IV-B). Under the BLOCK Act (Section 3), all those separate funding streams vanish as of October 1, 2025. The district now gets a single, potentially larger, check – but with way fewer strings attached. A farmer who previously benefited from rural education programs (Title V-B) might find those resources reallocated. A student in a program for neglected or delinquent youth (Title I-D) could see their program's budget change significantly. The state now decides how to divvy up the funds.
This shift is a double-edged sword. On one hand, states get way more flexibility. They can tailor spending to their specific needs, potentially cutting red tape and making the money go further. On the other hand, there's a real risk that programs serving specific, often vulnerable, student populations could get shortchanged. Programs aimed at low-income students, migrant children, English language learners, and Native American students – all previously supported by dedicated grants – are now competing for a slice of the same, potentially shrinking, pie. While the initial funding matches 2025 levels, the lack of guaranteed future funding creates uncertainty. It’s like getting a promotion but not knowing if your salary will be cut next year. This could make long-term planning a real headache for schools and districts.