PolicyBrief
H.R. 8323
119th CongressApr 16th 2026
SOUL Act of 2026
IN COMMITTEE

The SOUL Act of 2026 establishes a federal right for U.S. citizens to exclusively control their unique personal identity traits, including name, image, voice, and biometric data, against unauthorized commercial replication.

Andy Biggs
R

Andy Biggs

Representative

AZ-5

LEGISLATION

New SOUL Act Grants Lifetime-Plus-50-Year Control Over Your Digital Likeness, Affecting Platforms and Content Creators

Alright, let's talk about the SOUL Act of 2026, which is short for the Sovereign Ownership of Unique Likeness Act. This bill is a pretty big deal because it carves out a brand-new federal right for every U.S. citizen: exclusive control over their personal identity traits. Think of it as owning your digital self, from your name and face to your voice and even your genetic markers, and it's a right that sticks around for your entire life plus another 50 years after you're gone. Essentially, if someone wants to use your image, voice, or even an AI-generated version of you for commercial purposes, they’d better get your permission first.

Your Digital Persona, Your Rules

This bill sets up a federal right called "Sovereign Ownership of Unique Likeness" by amending Title 17 of the U.S. Code. What does 'unique likeness' cover? It’s pretty broad: your full name, nicknames, photos, videos, your physical appearance, how you move, your natural speaking or singing voice (even AI-generated versions), and biometric identifiers like your facial geometry or fingerprints. It also includes genetic markers if they're used to replicate your identity commercially, and even digital replicas like deepfakes. The idea is to make sure you, and only you, get to decide how these core elements of your identity are reproduced, distributed, or used to create new works. If someone makes an unauthorized deepfake of you, for example, this bill gives you a clear path to shut it down.

The Fine Print: What's Allowed and What's Not

Now, this isn't a blanket ban on all uses of your likeness. The bill includes some important exceptions. Things like non-commercial fair use—think parody, satire, news reporting, or scholarly commentary—are generally in the clear. So, if a comedian makes a joke about a public figure, or a news outlet uses a photo in a report, that’s likely protected. Government activities, like law enforcement or national security, also get a pass. And anything protected by the First Amendment, like free speech, is still fair game, though what exactly that means in practice will likely be debated in courts. The bill is also clear that it won't apply retroactively to uses authorized before it becomes law.

What Happens When Someone Steps Over the Line?

If someone uses your likeness without permission, you can take them to federal court. You could ask a judge to stop them from doing it again, order them to take down the unauthorized content, or even get damages. We're talking anywhere from $750 to $30,000 per violation, and up to $150,000 if the violation was willful. And here’s a kicker: you don't even have to prove that you lost money or that your reputation was harmed; the law just assumes harm. This is a big deal for platforms like social media sites or video hosting services. If they get a valid notice about unauthorized content and don't take it down, they could be held liable. This means they’ll have to be much more proactive about policing content, which could be a heavy lift, especially for smaller platforms. This bill would take effect 90 days after becoming law, so if it passes, things could change pretty quickly for how we all interact with our digital identities online.