The SOUL Act of 2026 establishes a federal right for U.S. citizens to exclusively control their unique personal identity traits, including name, image, voice, and biometric data, against unauthorized commercial replication.
Andy Biggs
Representative
AZ-5
The SOUL Act of 2026 establishes a new federal right granting every U.S. citizen exclusive control over their "unique likeness," including their name, image, voice, and biometric identifiers. This grants owners the exclusive right to control the commercial reproduction and use of their identity traits for their lifetime plus 50 years. The Act provides civil remedies, including statutory damages, for unauthorized digital replicas or synthetic media, while preserving First Amendment rights like parody and news reporting.
Alright, let's talk about the SOUL Act of 2026, which is short for the Sovereign Ownership of Unique Likeness Act. This bill is a pretty big deal because it carves out a brand-new federal right for every U.S. citizen: exclusive control over their personal identity traits. Think of it as owning your digital self, from your name and face to your voice and even your genetic markers, and it's a right that sticks around for your entire life plus another 50 years after you're gone. Essentially, if someone wants to use your image, voice, or even an AI-generated version of you for commercial purposes, they’d better get your permission first.
This bill sets up a federal right called "Sovereign Ownership of Unique Likeness" by amending Title 17 of the U.S. Code. What does 'unique likeness' cover? It’s pretty broad: your full name, nicknames, photos, videos, your physical appearance, how you move, your natural speaking or singing voice (even AI-generated versions), and biometric identifiers like your facial geometry or fingerprints. It also includes genetic markers if they're used to replicate your identity commercially, and even digital replicas like deepfakes. The idea is to make sure you, and only you, get to decide how these core elements of your identity are reproduced, distributed, or used to create new works. If someone makes an unauthorized deepfake of you, for example, this bill gives you a clear path to shut it down.
Now, this isn't a blanket ban on all uses of your likeness. The bill includes some important exceptions. Things like non-commercial fair use—think parody, satire, news reporting, or scholarly commentary—are generally in the clear. So, if a comedian makes a joke about a public figure, or a news outlet uses a photo in a report, that’s likely protected. Government activities, like law enforcement or national security, also get a pass. And anything protected by the First Amendment, like free speech, is still fair game, though what exactly that means in practice will likely be debated in courts. The bill is also clear that it won't apply retroactively to uses authorized before it becomes law.
If someone uses your likeness without permission, you can take them to federal court. You could ask a judge to stop them from doing it again, order them to take down the unauthorized content, or even get damages. We're talking anywhere from $750 to $30,000 per violation, and up to $150,000 if the violation was willful. And here’s a kicker: you don't even have to prove that you lost money or that your reputation was harmed; the law just assumes harm. This is a big deal for platforms like social media sites or video hosting services. If they get a valid notice about unauthorized content and don't take it down, they could be held liable. This means they’ll have to be much more proactive about policing content, which could be a heavy lift, especially for smaller platforms. This bill would take effect 90 days after becoming law, so if it passes, things could change pretty quickly for how we all interact with our digital identities online.