The No CIG Act establishes a $10.69 billion federal grant program to support the development and expansion of fixed guideway public transportation projects through 2026.
Scott Perry
Representative
PA-10
The "No CIG Act" establishes a restructured fixed guideway capital investment grant program to support public transportation infrastructure. The bill authorizes over $10.6 billion from 2022 through 2026 to fund New Starts, Core Capacity Improvement, and Small Starts projects. It sets clear criteria for project evaluation, rating, and federal cost-sharing to ensure efficient and effective investment in transit systems nationwide.
The No CIG Act is essentially a major renovation of how the federal government helps cities build and expand public transit. By replacing the existing Section 5309 program, this bill sets aside $10.69 billion through 2026 to fund everything from massive new subway lines to smaller bus rapid transit projects. It breaks these down into three buckets: 'New Starts' for big projects over $300 million, 'Small Starts' for more modest local upgrades, and 'Core Capacity' for fixing existing lines that are already packed like a sardine can. For anyone who has ever spent forty minutes waiting for a train or sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic wishing for a better bus lane, this bill is the blueprint for how those improvements actually get paid for.
To keep things organized, the bill creates a strict grading system for any city or state looking for a check. Under Section 2, projects aren't just funded on a whim; the Secretary of Transportation has to rate them from 'High' to 'Low' based on five specific factors: mobility improvements, environmental benefits, congestion relief, economic development, and cost-effectiveness. Think of it like a report card for your city’s transit plans. If a project doesn’t score at least a 'Medium' on both its justification and its financial plan, it’s likely not getting a dime. This ensures that tax dollars go toward projects that actually move people efficiently rather than 'trains to nowhere' that look good on a map but don't help your daily commute.
One of the most important parts of this bill is the 'local financial commitment' rule. For most big projects, the federal government will cover up to 60 percent of the cost, but the local government has to prove they can come up with at least 20 percent from non-federal sources. For a smaller town or a cash-strapped city, this is a high bar to clear. If your local transit agency can't find the cash to meet that 20 percent floor, the project is dead in the water before the first shovel hits the ground. However, the bill does offer a little extra help—a 10 percent bonus in federal share—if a city manages to bring in private companies through a public-private partnership, which might be the only way some mid-sized cities can afford to expand.
This isn't just about construction; the bill also funds the 'project development and engineering phase,' covering up to 50 percent of the costs for the planning and design work that happens years before a ribbon-cutting ceremony. This is huge for local planners who need to figure out exactly where a new light rail line should run without draining the city's entire budget on just the drawings. For the average person, this means that while you might not see a new bus line tomorrow, the bill provides the steady, five-year funding stream that allows local agencies to plan long-term. The catch? The Secretary has a lot of power in those 'High' to 'Low' ratings, meaning the future of your city's commute could depend heavily on how the Department of Transportation interprets 'economic development' in any given year.