The Hold ICE Accountable Act of 2026 establishes a process for appointing an independent special prosecutor to investigate and prosecute alleged unlawful actions by Department of Homeland Security personnel.
Haley Stevens
Representative
MI-11
The Hold ICE Accountable Act of 2026 establishes a framework for the appointment of an independent special prosecutor to investigate alleged unlawful actions by Department of Homeland Security personnel occurring on or after January 20, 2025. The bill grants this prosecutor broad investigative and staffing authority, ensures congressional oversight, and provides a pathway for individuals to pursue civil litigation against indicted officials.
This bill creates a heavy-duty watchdog system to investigate and prosecute unlawful actions by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel. Specifically, it targets any alleged illegal conduct occurring on or after January 20, 2025. The process kicks off when the U.S. Attorney General or any state-level Attorney General applies for a special prosecutor, triggering a three-judge panel to appoint an independent lawyer to lead the charge. This isn't just a internal review; the appointee cannot be a current or recent federal employee, ensuring they don't have 'skin in the game' or existing loyalties to the agencies they are investigating.
One of the most significant shifts here is the level of independence granted to this office. Under Section 4, the special prosecutor operates outside the day-to-day supervision of the Department of Justice. They have the power to hire their own staff, set their own investigative priorities, and decide whether or not to even tip off the Attorney General about what they’re doing. For a local business owner or a resident in a border community who feels a federal agent overstepped their bounds, this means the person investigating the claim isn't the agent's boss or colleague. The prosecutor has the same authority as a U.S. Attorney, including the power to go after anyone trying to mess with the investigation through witness intimidation or destroying evidence.
Section 6 of the bill changes the math for federal agents in the courtroom. If the special prosecutor indicts a DHS official, any person whose rights were violated by that official's actions can file a civil lawsuit for economic losses, emotional distress, and even punitive damages. Crucially, the bill strips away common legal shields: defendants cannot argue they were acting in 'good faith' or that the law they broke wasn't 'clearly established' at the time. Imagine a delivery driver whose vehicle is unlawfully searched and damaged; under this bill, they could sue the specific officer involved without that officer hiding behind the usual 'qualified immunity' defenses that often stall these cases in court.
To keep this powerful new office in check, the bill mandates a paper trail. The prosecutor must provide confidential status reports to the judicial panel and a final report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees explaining every decision they made—including why they chose not to prosecute certain cases. While the Attorney General technically holds the power to fire the special prosecutor, they can only do so for 'good cause' or physical/mental incapacity, and any such firing can be challenged in court within 30 days. This setup aims to prevent the office from becoming a revolving door of political appointments, focusing instead on long-term accountability for federal law enforcement.