The "Safeguarding American Workers Benefits Act" amends the tax code to require Social Security numbers for the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit be issued to U.S. citizens or those authorized to work in the U.S., effective for tax years after 2025.
Clay Higgins
Representative
LA-3
The "Safeguarding American Workers Benefits Act" amends the Internal Revenue Code to modify Social Security number (SSN) requirements for the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit. It mandates that to claim these credits, the SSN must be issued by the Social Security Administration to a U.S. citizen or someone authorized to work in the U.S. These modifications will be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.
The "Safeguarding American Workers Benefits Act" changes the rules for who can claim the Child Tax Credit (CTC) and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), starting in the 2026 tax year. The core change? Stricter Social Security number (SSN) requirements.
This bill, straight up, says that to claim the CTC or EITC, the SSNs provided (for you, and any qualifying child for the CTC) must be issued to either a U.S. citizen or someone authorized to work in the United States. This is a significant departure from prior rules, potentially impacting many families.
While the bill's stated aim is to prevent fraud, the practical effect could be to exclude many eligible families, particularly those with mixed immigration statuses or those who have had difficulty navigating the complexities of the Social Security Administration. The requirement that an SSN be specifically authorized for employment adds a layer of complexity and potential for denial, even for those legally residing and working in the U.S.
It's important to note that the definition of "authorized to work in the U.S." isn't explicitly laid out in this bill, leaving room for potentially narrow (and problematic) interpretations by the IRS.
This bill essentially creates a stricter gatekeeping mechanism for accessing these important tax credits. While reducing improper payments is a valid goal, the concern here is that the burden will fall disproportionately on vulnerable families who may already face challenges in accessing government services. The bill could potentially be used to deny credits to eligible families due to minor administrative errors or documentation issues. The added complexity could also deter some eligible families from even applying.