The Protecting Our Produce Act establishes a five-year pilot program to provide financial assistance to eligible specialty crop producers who suffer losses due to import-driven price declines.
Sanford Bishop
Representative
GA-2
The Protecting Our Produce Act establishes a five-year pilot program to provide financial assistance to eligible producers of seasonal crops, such as asparagus, blueberries, and squash. The program offers payments to farmers when domestic market prices drop due to increased imports. This initiative aims to support the stability of specialty crop growers through $200 million in annual authorized funding.
The Protecting Our Produce Act establishes a five-year pilot program starting in the 2025 marketing year to provide financial relief to U.S. farmers growing specific seasonal crops like asparagus, blueberries, and bell peppers. Under Section 2, the USDA will issue payments to producers if the national average price for these crops falls below their recent five-year average and the Secretary of Agriculture determines the drop was caused by foreign imports. With a budget of $200 million per year, the bill aims to stabilize income for smaller-scale growers who get at least 75% of their income from farming and earn less than $5 million annually.
This bill focuses on 'seasonal and perishable' crops—specifically asparagus, bell peppers, blueberries, cucumbers, and squash—that usually hit the market within four weeks of harvest. For a local farmer, this means if a sudden surge of imported cucumbers floods the market and drives prices down during their peak four-week window, the government could cut them a check for the difference. The payment is calculated by taking the gap between the historical 'Reference Price' and the current 'Effective Price' and multiplying it by the farmer’s average production volume. It’s essentially a localized insurance policy against global trade shifts that happen too fast for a small farm to pivot.
One of the trickier parts of the bill is that payments aren't automatic just because prices drop; the Secretary of Agriculture must decide that imports were the actual cause of the loss. This is a bit of a gray area—if a price drop happens because everyone decided to grow squash at once, farmers might be out of luck, but if it's tied to a shipment from abroad, the taxpayer-funded relief kicks in. For the average person at the grocery store, this could keep your local blueberry farm in business during a rough year, but it might also lead to trade friction that eventually affects what’s available in the produce aisle or how much you pay for it when domestic supplies are tight.
To make sure this money doesn't just flow to massive corporate conglomerates, the bill sets some boundaries. To qualify, a producer’s average adjusted gross income must be under $5,000,000, and they have to prove that farming is their primary livelihood (at least 75% of their income). While this protects the $1 billion total investment from being swallowed by 'hobby farmers' or massive industrial firms, it also puts a significant administrative burden on the USDA to verify these financials and trade impacts every year. It’s a high-stakes balancing act: trying to save the local farm from being priced out of existence while making sure the $200 million annual price tag actually solves the problem.