PolicyBrief
H.R. 7728
119th CongressFeb 26th 2026
Connect the Grid Act
IN COMMITTEE

The Connect the Grid Act establishes a national transmission planning framework, expands federal authority over transmission permitting, brings ERCOT under FERC jurisdiction, and mandates reliability upgrades between regional grids.

Gregorio Casar
D

Gregorio Casar

Representative

TX-35

LEGISLATION

Connect the Grid Act Mandates Massive National Power Line Expansion: Texas Grid Loses Independence by 2037

The Connect the Grid Act is a high-voltage overhaul of how electricity moves across the country. At its core, the bill gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the steering wheel to design a national transmission plan every three years, identifying where we need big new power lines to keep the lights on and prices down. It doesn’t just suggest where these lines should go; it gives the Secretary of Energy the power to designate 'National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors.' If a state drags its feet on a permit for more than a year or attaches too many strings, the federal government can step in and green-light the project itself (Section 1). For the average person, this could mean more reliable power during storms, but for a landowner in a newly designated 'corridor,' it might mean a much tougher fight against eminent domain.

Everything is Bigger (and Federally Regulated) in Texas

Perhaps the most dramatic shift hits the Lone Star State. Currently, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) operates like a power island, mostly exempt from federal oversight to avoid interstate regulation. This bill ends that 'island' status. It specifically strikes the legal exemptions that kept ERCOT independent, bringing it under FERC’s jurisdiction (Section 2). Furthermore, it mandates that by January 1, 2037, new high-capacity connections must be built between Texas and its neighbors—specifically requiring between 4.3 and 12.6 gigawatts of transfer capacity with the SPP grid and similar links to the MISO and Western grids (Section 3). For a family in Houston who lived through the 2021 freeze, this is designed to ensure that when the local grid fails, power can be imported from out of state to prevent blackouts.

Building on the Old to Power the New

Instead of just cutting through pristine forests, the bill pushes developers to use 'Grid Enhancing Technologies'—think of these as turbochargers for existing wires—and to prioritize building on 'degraded land' like abandoned mines, landfills, and brownfields (Section 3). There is also a significant 'Buy American' requirement: all iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in these projects must be produced in the U.S. unless it spikes the cost by more than 25% (Section 1). While this is a win for domestic manufacturing and labor, who are guaranteed 'prevailing wages' under the Davis-Bacon Act, it could also mean higher price tags for the infrastructure projects that eventually show up on your monthly utility bill.

The Cost of Connection

To fund this massive undertaking, the bill quintuples the borrowing authority for the Transmission Facilitation Program, jumping from $2.5 billion to $13.5 billion (Section 4). It also looks south, ordering a study within one year to see if connecting our grid with Mexico could lower costs or help the climate (Section 5). The trade-off here is clear: the bill bets big on federal authority to solve the 'not in my backyard' problem that often stalls energy projects. While this central planning aims to modernize a creaky 20th-century grid for a 21st-century world, it significantly reduces the power of local communities and state governments to say 'no' to the giant towers coming to a field near them.