The Stop Wasteful Advertising by the Government (SWAG) Act prohibits federal agencies from using taxpayer funds to purchase promotional merchandise or create mascots for self-promotion.
Michael Cloud
Representative
TX-27
The Stop Wasteful Advertising by the Government (SWAG) Act prohibits federal agencies from spending taxpayer funds on promotional merchandise and the creation of mascots. The bill aims to reduce unnecessary government spending by requiring agencies to justify their public relations and advertising expenditures with evidence of a positive return on investment. Exceptions are provided for essential functions, such as military recruitment and census operations.
The 'Stop Wasteful Advertising by the Government' (SWAG) Act aims to pull the plug on taxpayer-funded trinkets and promotional characters. Under Section 3, federal agencies would be prohibited from spending money on 'swag'—defined as items like fidget spinners, snuggies, holiday ornaments, and stress balls—when the sole purpose is advertising or self-promotion. The bill also bans the creation or use of agency mascots, putting an end to costumed characters representing bureaucratic programs unless they are specifically protected by existing law or used for military recruitment.
For the average person, this means the next time you visit a government booth at a local fair, you probably won't be walking away with a branded jar grip opener or a government-issued koozie. The bill lists a wide variety of items under the 'swag' ban, including everything from candy and stickers to neckties and coloring books (Sec. 2). However, it isn't a total blackout on all physical goods. Agencies can still hand out informational brochures, and the military can continue issuing challenge coins or medals for service. The Census Bureau is also exempted so it can keep using tools to help count the population. For small businesses in the promotional products industry, this could mean a noticeable dip in federal contracts, as agencies are forced to tighten their belts on 'merch.'
There is a significant loophole: agencies can still buy swag if it supports a specific mission and provides a 'positive return on investment' (Sec. 3). This is where things get a bit technical. The bill requires agencies to justify these costs in their annual budget reports to Congress. While this adds a layer of accountability, the term 'positive return' is somewhat vague. For example, if a health agency gives out branded water bottles to encourage hydration, they’ll have to prove that those bottles actually improved public health outcomes enough to justify the cost. It’s a shift toward a 'show me the receipts' culture in government PR.
While the bill generally kills off agency mascots, it makes a clear exception for military recruitment and athletic teams at military academies. This means you’ll still see mascots at the Army-Navy game, but you likely won't see a new costumed character created to promote a specific regulatory program. By requiring the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to set strict regulations within 180 days, the law aims to ensure that tax dollars are spent on core services—like infrastructure or public safety—rather than on building a brand identity for a government department.