This bill denies U.S. businesses an income tax deduction for payments made to foreign entities for labor or services primarily benefiting U.S. consumers.
Austin Scott
Representative
GA-8
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to deny U.S. businesses a tax deduction for payments made to foreign entities for labor or services primarily benefiting American consumers. It establishes new rules to define and calculate these non-deductible "outsourcing payments." The goal is to discourage the shifting of certain service work overseas.
If your company pays a foreign firm to handle customer service, IT support, or manufacturing for U.S. customers, Uncle Sam is about to stop helping them foot the bill. Under this proposed change to the Internal Revenue Code, a new section—280I—would flatly deny businesses the ability to deduct 'outsourcing payments' from their taxes. Currently, most business expenses are deductible, meaning they lower the amount of income a company is actually taxed on. Starting December 31, 2025, if a payment goes to a foreign person for labor or services that ultimately benefit people living in the States, that tax break disappears. It’s a direct attempt to make hiring abroad more expensive and, by extension, making domestic hiring look a lot more attractive.
This isn't just about big tech or call centers; it hits any business that pays for foreign services used by U.S. consumers. For example, if a clothing brand in Ohio pays a factory in Vietnam to sew shirts sold in Chicago, or a software startup in Austin pays developers in Poland to build an app for American users, those fees are no longer tax-deductible. The bill is very specific: if the 'benefit' of the work is directed at U.S. consumers, the payment is on the chopping block. For a business owner, this means their taxable income could jump significantly even if their revenue stays the same, potentially forcing a choice between raising prices for you or moving those jobs back to U.S. soil.
Real life is rarely all-or-nothing, and the bill accounts for that with a 'mixed-use' formula. Imagine a global consulting firm that provides tech support for a multinational company with offices in both New York and London. Under this rule, the firm can’t just write off the whole bill. They have to use a fraction: the amount of work for U.S. customers divided by the total work done. If 60% of the support was for the New York office, 60% of that payment becomes non-deductible. It sounds fair on paper, but it’s a bookkeeping nightmare waiting to happen. Small to mid-sized businesses might find themselves drowning in spreadsheets just to prove to the IRS which portion of a foreign freelancer’s work was 'U.S.-facing.'
While the goal is to boost domestic jobs, the ripple effects could be felt in your wallet. If it becomes 20% or 30% more expensive for a company to use foreign labor because they lost their tax deduction, those costs don't just vanish—they often get passed down to the consumer. Additionally, the bill gives the Treasury Secretary broad power to write the 'anti-abuse' rules. This is aimed at stopping companies from using clever accounting tricks or 'transfer pricing' (moving money between different branches of the same company) to hide outsourcing. For the average worker, this could mean more job openings at home, but for the average shopper, it might mean the price of that app subscription or those sneakers is headed north.