This act amends existing law to allow federal grants to fund projects focused on bringing jobs back to the U.S. and supporting domestic manufacturing growth.
Jeff Hurd
Representative
CO-3
The Made in America Jobs Act of 2026 amends existing federal grant programs to prioritize economic development projects that bring jobs back to the United States. This legislation specifically allows public works, planning, and training grants to be used for facilitating the relocation of employment sources and supporting domestic manufacturing growth. The goal is to stimulate job creation by incentivizing the return of industries and expansion of U.S. manufacturing capacity.
The Made in America Jobs Act of 2026 updates the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to explicitly allow federal grant money to be used for bringing overseas jobs back to U.S. soil. By amending Section 201(c) and Section 207(a)(2), the bill opens up funding for public works projects, business cluster marketing, and technical assistance specifically aimed at expanding the manufacturing sector. This means federal dollars can now be used to help a company cover the logistical and infrastructure costs of moving a factory from another country to a local American town.
For a town that lost its local mill or factory a decade ago, this bill changes the math on revitalization. Under Section 2, local governments can apply for grants to build the roads, water lines, or power grids needed to convince a manufacturer to relocate their operations back to the U.S. Instead of just general 'economic development,' the bill specifically targets 'facilitating the relocation to the United States of a source of employment currently located outside the country.' For a worker in the Rust Belt or a rural community, this could mean the difference between a vacant lot and a new shift opening up at a local plant.
The bill doesn't just fund the heavy lifting; it also funds the brainwork behind it. By updating Section 203(a), the legislation allows planning grants to be used for strategizing how to grow the manufacturing sector. This could involve a city hiring experts to map out 'business clusters'—groups of related businesses that work better when they are close together, like an auto plant and its parts suppliers. For a small business owner who makes specialized components, being part of a federally funded business cluster could mean better access to local clients and a more stable supply chain.
Moving a factory is one thing, but running it requires a modern workforce. The bill updates Section 207 to allow grants for training and research that support manufacturing growth. This might look like a local community college getting federal funds to set up a specialized robotics or machining program tailored to a company moving back from overseas. While the bill is clear about its goals, the 'medium' level of vagueness in terms like 'facilitating the relocation' means the government will need to be careful. There is a risk that funds could be used for administrative overhead or by companies that were already planning to move, rather than creating brand-new opportunities for the local workforce.