This bill establishes a federal crime prohibiting registered sex offenders from obtaining a child through surrogacy and grants federal courts jurisdiction over related civil actions.
Nancy Mace
Representative
SC-1
The Protecting Children in Surrogacy Act establishes a federal crime prohibiting registered sex offenders from obtaining a child through surrogacy, carrying penalties of fines or imprisonment. It also grants federal courts jurisdiction over civil actions involving surrogacy contracts under specific circumstances related to interstate or foreign commerce. This legislation aims to safeguard children by preventing sex offenders from utilizing surrogacy arrangements.
The Protecting Children in Surrogacy Act creates a strict federal prohibition preventing any individual on the National Sex Offender Registry from acquiring legal or physical custody of a child through surrogacy. Under this bill, a 'covered sex offender' who knowingly enters into a surrogacy contract or obtains a child through these arrangements faces federal felony charges, carrying a penalty of significant fines and up to 10 years in prison. The legislation specifically targets the 'intended parent'—the person who would take permanent custody of the child—and renders any such contract legally unenforceable in federal court.
While surrogacy is often handled at the state level, this bill uses an incredibly broad definition of 'interstate commerce' to bring these cases under federal jurisdiction. If you use the mail to send a contract, wire money for a clinic fee, or even use a computer to communicate about the arrangement across state lines, the federal government can step in. Even if a piece of medical equipment used in the process once crossed a state border, the bill considers it a federal matter. For professionals in the surrogacy industry, this means a massive increase in due diligence; agencies and lawyers will likely need to implement rigorous background check protocols to ensure they aren't inadvertently facilitating a contract that could land their clients in federal prison and leave the legal status of a child in limbo.
The bill provides very specific, and in some cases unique, definitions for those involved. It defines a 'surrogate mother' strictly as a 'female,' using biological language that focuses on the reproductive system's capacity to produce eggs. This precision is mirrored in how the bill defines 'obtaining' a child, which covers everything from gaining legal guardianship to simple physical custody. While the primary goal is to prevent children from being placed in homes with a history of sexual offenses, the absolute nature of the ban doesn't leave room for nuance. For example, an individual who committed a registrable offense decades ago and has since lived a law-abiding life would be permanently barred from this specific path to parenthood, regardless of any modern character assessments or state-level family court approvals.
By granting federal district courts original jurisdiction over these civil actions, the bill creates a new legal pathway to challenge surrogacy agreements. This could lead to complex situations where a child is already born, but the contract is suddenly deemed void because an intended parent's registry status is discovered. Because the bill also applies if any 'payment of any kind' is made through interstate channels, almost every modern surrogacy arrangement—which typically involves electronic bank transfers and specialized insurance—will fall under these new rules. The result is a high-stakes environment for intended parents and surrogacy agencies alike, where a single background check oversight could trigger a decade of prison time and the immediate dissolution of parental rights.