This act mandates that any future authorization for military force or declaration of war must include specific, jointly determined funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs to cover earned veteran benefits.
Chris Deluzio
Representative
PA-17
The Full Cost of War Act mandates that all future authorizations for the use of military force or declarations of war must include dedicated funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs. This provision ensures that resources are specifically allocated to cover medical care, disability compensation, and other earned benefits for veterans affected by the authorized military action.
The Full Cost of War Act introduces a major shift in how the U.S. government plans for military conflict. Under this bill, any future Congressional authorization for the use of military force or formal declaration of war must include a pre-negotiated funding plan for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Essentially, it requires lawmakers to acknowledge the long-term price tag of human care at the same moment they decide to engage in combat, ensuring that medical care and disability compensation aren't treated as an afterthought years down the line.
This legislation changes the fiscal workflow of national defense by linking the 'go' signal of a conflict to the financial support of those who fight it. Section 2 of the bill specifies that any new authorization must approve the necessary funds for the VA to provide medical care and disability benefits specifically for veterans impacted by that specific military action. For a service member deployed under a future authorization, this means their potential healthcare and disability needs are legally tied to the mission's initial budget. It moves veterans' benefits from a fluctuating annual budget debate into a mandatory component of war planning.
One of the more complex parts of this bill is how that dollar amount gets decided. The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are required to jointly determine the specific amount of funding needed for these benefits. In the real world, this could look like a high-stakes negotiation between the Pentagon, which focuses on immediate operational costs, and the VA, which manages long-term care. While this ensures the VA has a seat at the table from day one, the 'Medium' vagueness of how these two departments will reach an agreement could lead to bureaucratic friction if they can't agree on the projected number of injuries or the long-term cost of specialized care.
For the average citizen or taxpayer, this bill provides a more transparent look at the 'true' cost of military engagement. Instead of seeing only the cost of fuel, ammunition, and salaries, the public would see a projected cost for the lifetime care of the soldiers involved. For a small business owner or a tech worker, this adds a layer of fiscal honesty to foreign policy. By requiring this funding upfront, the bill aims to prevent future backlogs or funding gaps at the VA, ensuring that when a soldier returns home and needs a doctor or a disability check, the money was already set aside when the first boots hit the ground.