PolicyBrief
H.R. 717
119th CongressJan 23rd 2025
Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act of 2025 establishes grant programs and interagency coordination to conserve, map, and improve habitat connectivity for migratory big game and other native wildlife.

Ryan Zinke
R

Ryan Zinke

Representative

MT-1

LEGISLATION

Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act Proposes New Grants and Mapping to Clear the Path for Big Game Migration by 2026.

The Wildlife Movement Through Partnerships Act of 2025 aims to fix a problem that anyone who’s ever hit a deer on a dark highway understands: animals need to move, and our infrastructure often gets in the way. Starting in 2026, this bill would establish a major grant program to fund projects that help big game—think elk, moose, and bighorn sheep—travel safely between their seasonal habitats. It’s not just about animal welfare; it’s about using data to figure out exactly where these animals are going and making sure those paths don't become dead ends. By coordinating efforts between the Department of the Interior, the USDA, and the Department of Transportation, the bill seeks to turn scientific tracking into real-world fixes like modified fencing and improved road crossings.

A Roadmap for Migration

One of the biggest moves in this bill is the creation of the Wildlife Movement and Movement Area Grant Program (Section 4). Administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, this program will offer competitive grants where the federal government covers up to 90% of the bill. For a local county government or a tribal agency, this could mean finally having the cash to install wildlife-friendly fencing or secure a conservation easement on a critical piece of land. The bill also tasks the USGS with building a 'Corridor Mapping Team' (Section 7) to use GPS data to create a high-tech map of where wildlife actually travels. For a commuter, this mapping could eventually lead to fewer 'surprises' on the road, as transportation departments use that data to prioritize where to build wildlife overpasses or underpasses.

Respecting the Fence Line

Because policy often runs into friction when it hits private land, this bill includes specific 'safety valves' to keep things voluntary. Section 10 explicitly states that these funds cannot be used to force changes in how a rancher runs their livestock, how a logger harvests timber, or how a developer uses existing water or mineral rights. It’s designed to be a 'carrots, not sticks' approach, focusing on voluntary partnerships with landowners rather than new regulations. For a farmer whose back forty is a known elk thoroughfare, this could mean getting technical help to modify fences so they’re easier on the animals without losing the ability to keep cattle in. The bill also includes a strict requirement (Section 8) to protect sensitive data, ensuring that mapping wildlife doesn't accidentally hand a GPS-guided map to poachers.

The Cost of Connection

While the bill authorizes 'such sums as necessary' through 2031, it sets a clear priority: at least 50% of the money must go specifically to big game species like deer and pronghorn (Section 4). This focus reflects the economic reality of many Western states where hunting and wildlife viewing are major revenue drivers. However, since the funding amount isn't a fixed number, the actual impact will depend on how much Congress decides to shell out during the yearly budget process. For the average person, the success of this bill will be measured in the long term—fewer insurance claims from animal-vehicle collisions and more stable wildlife populations that keep local outdoor economies humming.