This bill holds wealthy colleges and universities with large endowments accountable for high student loan default rates and rising tuition costs through new financial penalties and increased excise taxes.
Beth Van Duyne
Representative
TX-24
The Preventing Financial Exploitation in Higher Education Act holds wealthy colleges and universities accountable for student loan outcomes and rising tuition costs. The bill imposes financial penalties on institutions with endowments over $2.5 billion that experience high rates of student loan default, delinquency, or underpayment. Additionally, it increases the excise tax on the net investment income of these large institutions if they raise tuition beyond inflation-adjusted levels.
The 'Preventing Financial Exploitation in Higher Education Act' aims to turn the tables on elite universities with massive bank accounts. Starting in fiscal year 2025, the bill targets schools with endowments of at least $2.5 billion, forcing them to pay significant financial penalties if their former students struggle to pay back federal loans. This isn't just about total defaults; it introduces new metrics for 'delinquency' (missing payments for 31 to 360 days) and 'underpayment' (making payments that don't even cover the interest, causing the balance to grow). If a school’s rates hit certain triggers—like an 11% default rate in 2025—the institution must pay the Department of Education a penalty equal to 30% of the total outstanding principal and interest of those loans (Section 2). These thresholds get stricter every year until 2030, eventually penalizing schools if more than 6% of their students default or 4% fall into underpayment.
Think of this like a warranty for your degree. Right now, if a student at a top-tier university graduates with $50,000 in debt but can’t find a job that pays enough to cover the interest, the school still keeps the tuition money while the taxpayer and the student carry the risk. Under this bill, the school becomes a financial stakeholder in that student's success. For example, if a prestigious university with a $3 billion endowment has a high number of graduates in 'underpayment'—meaning their balances are actually getting bigger despite making regular payments—the school will have to cut a check to the federal government. This creates a massive incentive for wealthy institutions to ensure their programs actually lead to high-paying careers or to lower the amount of debt students need to take on in the first place.
The bill also takes a swing at the rising cost of attendance through the tax code. Starting in 2026, the bill hikes the excise tax on a wealthy school’s net investment income from a tiny 1.4% to a whopping 25% (Section 4). However, this only kicks in if the school raises its average tuition faster than the rate of inflation. It uses 2025 as the 'base year' for tuition costs. If you’re a student or a parent looking at a school with a multi-billion dollar safety net, this provision is designed to keep your bill from skyrocketing. If the school wants to keep its investment profits taxed at the lower rate, it effectively has to cap its tuition increases to match the cost of living.
While this bill puts the squeeze on administrators, it explicitly protects borrowers. Section 2 makes it clear that even if a school pays a penalty, your individual loan terms, rights, and obligations don't change—you don't get a 'free pass' on your debt just because your school was fined. The real challenge lies in the definitions and the math. The bill gives the Treasury Secretary the power to create 'alternative methods' to prevent schools from gaming the system, especially new institutions or those trying to manipulate their tuition data to stay under the inflation cap. For the average person, this means the 'prestige' of a school might soon be measured by how well its graduates can actually afford their lives, rather than just the size of the campus library.