This bill mandates Federal Reserve regulations to promote competition in credit card processing networks by requiring large issuers to allow merchants to choose between eligible networks for transaction routing.
Lance Gooden
Representative
TX-5
The Credit Card Competition Act of 2026 aims to increase competition in credit card processing by requiring large issuers and networks to allow merchants to choose which network processes their transactions. This legislation mandates new Federal Reserve Board regulations that prohibit restrictions preventing merchants from selecting an eligible processing network. The rules specifically target large card issuers and networks, while exempting certain three-party payment systems.
Alright, let's talk credit cards. We all use 'em, and we all know those little fees add up, right? This new piece of proposed legislation, the Credit Card Competition Act of 2026, is looking to shake things up, but it's got some interesting twists. The big idea here is to inject some competition into how your credit card transactions get processed.
Basically, the bill tells the Federal Reserve Board to get busy. Within a year of this thing passing, they've got to issue new rules. The main goal? Stop the biggest credit card issuers and payment networks from locking you (or, more accurately, the businesses you buy from) into just one processing network. Think of it like this: right now, when you swipe your card, the transaction often has to go through a specific 'toll road' chosen by your card issuer. This bill wants to open up more 'toll roads' for businesses to choose from.
Specifically, if you're a covered card issuer (that's a big bank with over $100 billion in assets, including its buddies), you can't limit a credit card to just one network. You also can't force it through two networks that are owned by the same company or are on some new national security risk list. The goal is to give merchants more options, which, in theory, should drive down those processing fees we all indirectly pay.
For small business owners, this could be a pretty big deal. The bill says the new rules must stop card issuers and networks from telling a merchant which eligible network they have to use. So, if you run a coffee shop or a construction supply store, you could potentially pick the network that offers you the best rates for processing your customers' payments. No more penalties for choosing a different network, and they can't force you to use a security tech (like tokenization) that isn't available to all the networks that can handle your card. This is all laid out in Section 2 of the bill.
Now, here's the kicker: this whole 'network choice' thing doesn't apply to credit cards issued in a '3-party payment system model.' That's where the card issuer and the network are basically the same company or under common ownership. Think of some popular store-branded cards that also handle their own processing. For those, it's business as usual. This exemption, also in Section 2, means a chunk of the market won't see these new competition rules, which could limit the overall impact.
Beyond competition, the bill also tasks the Federal Reserve Board (in consultation with the Treasury Secretary) with creating a public list of payment card networks that pose a risk to U.S. national security or are owned by a foreign state. This list needs to be set up within a year and updated every two years. The idea is to keep an eye on who's handling our financial data and where those networks are based. However, the bill doesn't get super specific about what exactly constitutes a 'national security risk,' which leaves a bit of wiggle room for interpretation down the line.
One last thing to note: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), usually a big player in consumer financial protection, is explicitly prohibited from enforcing these new rules. That job falls squarely on the Federal Reserve Board. The regulations themselves will kick in 180 days after they're finalized, giving everyone some time to adjust.
So, while the promise of more competition could mean lower costs for businesses (and maybe eventually for us), the exemptions and the broad strokes around national security lists mean we'll want to watch how the Fed actually implements these new regulations.