The BEACON Act of 2026 establishes Department of Veterans Affairs grant programs to fund research and trials for new, supplemental neurorehabilitation treatments for veterans suffering from chronic mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
Jack Bergman
Representative
MI-1
The BEACON Act of 2026 establishes two new Department of Veterans Affairs grant programs to significantly advance the treatment of veterans suffering from chronic mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). These programs will fund research, clinical trials, and the testing of new, non-drug neurorehabilitation approaches focused on improving mental health outcomes. The legislation aims to foster partnerships and independent third-party studies to identify and implement best practices for mTBI care outside of traditional VA pathways.
The Veterans TBI Breakthrough Exploration of Adaptive Care Opportunities Nationwide Act of 2026, or the BEACON Act, is setting up two distinct, three-year grant programs within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) focused on finding better ways to treat chronic mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in veterans. The big picture here is moving away from just prescribing drugs and funding research into supplemental, non-drug neurorehabilitation approaches. The goal isn’t just to treat the physical injury, but explicitly to improve veterans’ mental health and reduce the risk factors for suicide, like depression, that often follow an mTBI.
Section 2 of the BEACON Act establishes the main grant program, which is authorized to receive $30 million between fiscal years 2026 and 2028. This money is earmarked for organizations—like academic institutions, nonprofits, or private clinics—to design and test new, patient-centered, non-drug treatments for chronic mTBI. Think of treatments that might involve advanced physical therapy, cognitive training, or other specialized rehabilitation techniques. These grants are capped at $5 million per year per recipient, and the organizations must use the funds to run clinical studies, train clinicians, and raise awareness among veterans and their families. The VA Secretary has 180 days to issue the rules for this program, so it’s designed to start moving fast.
If you’re a veteran dealing with the long-term effects of a mild TBI—the kind that leaves you struggling with focus, memory, and mood—this bill is designed to find you better options. Currently, treatment often relies heavily on medication to manage symptoms. This legislation shifts focus to finding treatments that fix the underlying issues, not just mask them. For a veteran struggling to hold a job or maintain relationships because of persistent mTBI symptoms, this research could lead to validated therapies that offer a real path to recovery. The bill specifically requires that the research measures improvements in mental health and reductions in suicidality, directly linking physical rehabilitation to critical mental wellness outcomes.
Section 3 sets up a second, smaller grant program specifically for independent third parties, like the National Center for PTSD, to validate the findings. This is a smart check-and-balance move. This section authorizes another $10 million annually for three years (FY 2026-2028) to fund pilot projects ($625,000 each) and larger collaborative initiatives ($1.5 million each). The independent organization’s job is to run randomized, controlled clinical trials—the gold standard for medical proof—to make sure these new treatments actually work and to establish a standard of care. This means that if a new therapy shows promise in the first grant program (Sec. 2), it gets rigorously tested by an outside group (Sec. 3) before the VA considers rolling it out nationwide. This structure aims to prevent the VA from adopting unproven treatments.
There are two administrative details worth noting. First, while Congress authorizes new funds, Section 2 allows the VA to use money from its existing general mental health care programs to fund the grant program. This means some of the research money might come from reallocating current VA funds, not just new appropriations. Second, both grant programs are set to expire after three years. While this gives researchers a strong incentive to produce results quickly, it’s a relatively short timeline for complex, longitudinal clinical research. If a promising study takes four years to complete, the funding authority will have already run out, which could complicate the long-term adoption of successful treatments.