This bill expands the tax exclusion for military earnings to cover compensation received by Armed Forces members for certain overseas deployments, effective after 2025.
Mike Rogers
Representative
AL-3
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude certain earnings of U.S. Armed Forces members from gross income for federal tax purposes. Specifically, it expands the existing combat zone exclusion to cover compensation earned during qualifying overseas deployments, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2025. The legislation defines "overseas service" while excluding service under permanent change of station orders.
This bill proposes a significant financial change for service members: making the income earned during certain overseas deployments exempt from federal income tax. Starting with the 2026 tax year (for income earned after December 31, 2025), enlisted personnel and officers serving outside the United States will no longer have to pay federal tax on that compensation. This is a direct, substantial boost to the take-home pay of deployed military members.
Currently, the military has a combat zone exclusion (Section 112) that makes pay earned in designated combat zones tax-free. This bill expands that concept to cover all overseas service, provided it’s not under a Permanent Change of Station (PCS) order. Think of it this way: if you’re deployed to a location outside the U.S. for a rotation or temporary duty (TDY), your pay for that time is now shielded from federal taxes. However, if you and your family are moving to an overseas base like Ramstein, Germany, or Yokosuka, Japan, under official PCS orders, that income is still taxable. The bill defines “overseas” as any area outside the United States and its territories. This distinction is key: the exclusion targets temporary, often higher-stress deployments, rather than long-term assignments.
For a service member deployed for six months, this change translates directly into thousands of extra dollars in their pocket—money that isn't immediately clawed back by the IRS. For instance, a Petty Officer or Staff Sergeant deployed to a non-combat zone area would see their entire deployment income become tax-free. This is real money that can go toward paying down debt, saving for a down payment, or simply easing the financial pressure on the spouse managing things back home. It acts as a powerful incentive and a financial reward for service members who are regularly away from their families and facing the stresses of deployment.
The Medium vagueness level noted in the analysis hinges on that PCS exclusion. The bill explicitly states that the exclusion does not apply during any month (or part of a month) when the service member is overseas under permanent change of station orders. This is the detail that could create confusion. What if a service member is deployed overseas for six months, and then, in the middle of that period, their status changes to a PCS to that same location? The tax exclusion would stop immediately. This requires clear guidance from the Department of Defense and the IRS to ensure service members know exactly when their pay flips from tax-free to taxable to avoid messy tax situations come filing time. While the intent is clearly to benefit deployed personnel, the precise definition of 'PCS orders' will be critical for implementation.