This bill establishes a new "Schedule PolicyCareer" category within the federal excepted service to increase executive branch accountability by streamlining the classification and removal of employees in policy-influencing positions.
Andrew Ogles
Representative
TN-5
The "End the Deep State Act" aims to increase executive branch accountability by reclassifying certain federal positions involved in policy-making and confidential work into a new "Schedule PolicyCareer" category. This legislation removes standard civil service protections for these roles, allowing for greater presidential control over the federal workforce. Additionally, the bill mandates regular agency reviews to identify positions for this new classification and requires employees in these roles to faithfully implement administration policies.
The 'End the Deep State Act' aims to fundamentally change how the federal government is staffed by creating a new category of employees called 'Schedule PolicyCareer.' Under this bill, thousands of career civil servants who work in 'confidential' or 'policy-making' roles would be moved into a special class where they no longer have standard civil service protections. This means the typical rules that prevent federal workers from being fired without cause would vanish for these positions, giving the President and their appointees significantly more power to hire and fire the people who write regulations and manage agency programs. The bill sets an aggressive timeline, requiring agency heads to finish their first round of employee reviews by August 18, 2025.
This legislation introduces 'Schedule PolicyCareer' to the list of job categories that bypass the standard competitive hiring process (Section 5). While current law protects most career employees from being fired for political reasons, this bill explicitly states that standard removal rules will not apply to this new category. For a regular person, this could mean that the scientist reviewing your local water quality or the analyst managing small business loans might now serve at the pleasure of the administration. While Section 7 says employees can’t be forced to support a President’s politics, it also says they can be fired for failing to 'faithfully implement' administration policies—a broad standard that could be interpreted in many ways.
The bill gives agency heads wide discretion to decide which jobs move to the new, less-protected schedule (Section 6). It specifically targets roles involving 'substantive participation' in drafting regulations, supervising attorneys, or handling 'non-public policy proposals.' This isn't just about high-level executives; it could include GS-13 level staff—mid-career professionals who do the heavy lifting on technical guidance. If you are a federal employee in one of these roles, your job security could depend entirely on how an agency head interprets 'policy-advocating' duties. For the public, this change might mean that the technical expertise built up over decades at an agency like the EPA or the Department of Labor could be swapped out for new staff every four to eight years.
This is a massive logistical undertaking with a 'high' level of vagueness regarding which specific jobs qualify for the new status. By April 20, 2025, every agency head must have a preliminary list of positions to be reclassified. The bill also revokes Executive Order 14003, which previously bolstered worker protections, and invalidates several existing civil service regulations (Section 8 and 10). Because the definitions of 'policy-determining' are so broad, we could see a flood of petitions to the Federal Labor Relations Authority to kick these employees out of their unions. The result could be a federal workforce that is much more responsive to the White House but potentially less stable and less insulated from political shifts.