PolicyBrief
H.R. 6912
119th CongressDec 19th 2025
Remotely Piloted Aircraft Crews Tax Relief Act
IN COMMITTEE

This act expands tax-exempt compensation for military personnel operating remotely piloted aircraft in combat zones or providing direct support to those operations.

Steven Horsford
D

Steven Horsford

Representative

NV-4

LEGISLATION

Drone Operators and Support Crews Get Tax-Free Pay in Combat Zones Under New IRS Code Amendment

The Remotely Piloted Aircraft Crews Tax Relief Act is straightforward: it amends Section 112 of the Internal Revenue Code to expand who qualifies for tax-free pay when serving in a combat zone. Currently, if you’re actively serving in a designated combat zone, your compensation is excluded from taxable income. This bill updates that definition to include key roles in modern warfare, specifically focusing on remote operations and the high-tech support that makes them possible. The change applies to all compensation received for active service performed after the date the bill becomes law.

The New Definition of Active Service

This legislation recognizes that not all combat service involves having boots on the ground in a hostile area. It adds two specific groups to the tax-exempt list. First, it covers military personnel operating a remotely piloted aircraft—a drone—when that aircraft is physically located in a combat zone. Second, it includes the people providing the high-level support for those operations: those handling intelligence, targeting, or command and control. Think of the analysts and technical specialists who are often thousands of miles away but are directly responsible for the mission's success or failure. This means their pay for those periods of active service is no longer subject to federal income tax.

Why This Matters for Service Members

For the service members in these specialized roles, this is a direct financial benefit. For years, there’s been a disparity where a pilot flying a manned aircraft over a combat zone received tax-free pay, but the drone operator flying the same mission from a remote base did not—even though the mission was equally critical and often high-stress. This bill corrects that by aligning the tax treatment of these modern roles with traditional combat service. It’s an official recognition of the demanding nature of remote warfare operations and the dedication required from the technical and intelligence crews.

The Administrative Catch

While the benefit for drone operators is clear, there is a small administrative detail for the support crews. The compensation for intelligence, targeting, and command and control personnel is only tax-exempt if the Secretary of Defense certifies that their work is in direct support of the combat zone operation. This certification requirement (found in Section 2) is meant to prevent the benefit from applying too broadly—say, to every analyst in the Pentagon—but it also introduces a layer of bureaucracy. If that certification process isn't smooth and consistent, it could delay or complicate access to the tax exclusion for the support staff who truly deserve it.