This act establishes a "least burdensome" standard for the FDA when evaluating certain requests related to over-the-counter monograph drugs to promote consumer choice and self-care.
Greg Landsman
Representative
OH-1
The ACCESS Through OTC Innovation Act aims to streamline the process for updating Over-the-Counter (OTC) drug monographs. It directs the FDA to apply a "least burdensome" standard when evaluating requests for evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of certain OTC drugs. The bill also mandates that the FDA meet with requestors to provide recommendations on necessary evidence if published reports are insufficient.
The ACCESS Through OTC Innovation Act (SEC. 2) is all about streamlining how certain over-the-counter (OTC) drugs get approved or updated. Think of it as a push to update the regulatory playbook for the stuff you grab off the pharmacy shelf without a prescription.
This section specifically targets the process for determining if an OTC drug is “generally recognized as safe and effective” (GRAS/E). It requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to use the “least burdensome appropriate means” when reviewing the evidence submitted by drug sponsors. What does that mean for you? It’s a mandate for efficiency. Instead of making companies jump through every possible hoop, the FDA must choose the most direct, least costly, and least time-consuming way to confirm a drug’s safety and effectiveness, provided it meets the legal standard.
If a drug company submits a request (under subsection (b)(5)) but the initial published reports aren't enough to satisfy the FDA, this bill forces the agency to step up and help. The FDA must meet with the requestor, upon a reasonable written request, to lay out exactly what kind of evidence they still need. This isn't just a casual chat; the FDA is required to provide specific recommendations on the “design and size of any necessary studies.”
This provision is huge for transparency and speed. Imagine you run a small pharmaceutical company trying to get a new formulation of a pain reliever approved. Instead of submitting a study, waiting six months for a rejection, and then guessing what the FDA wants next, you get a mandatory meeting where the agency tells you, "Look, we need a study with 200 participants over six weeks, focusing on this specific side effect." The FDA must then document those recommendations and meeting minutes for the official record. This clarity should significantly reduce the back-and-forth that currently stalls innovation.
For the average person, this procedural change could translate directly into faster access to updated and improved OTC medications. If the process is less burdensome for manufacturers, they can bring safe, effective products to market quicker. Maybe it’s a new topical cream, or a better formulation of a common allergy pill. The goal here is to accelerate the regulatory clock without sacrificing safety standards—the bill explicitly states that this new “least burdensome” standard does not change the existing criteria for determining if a drug is actually safe and effective.
While the phrase “least burdensome appropriate means” gives the FDA some discretion—which could lead to inconsistent application if they aren't careful—the requirement for documented meetings and specific recommendations acts as a strong check. It forces the agency to be accountable for its evidence requirements, which is a win for both innovation and the consumer who just wants to find the best medicine on the shelf.