This bill establishes a new federal tax credit for businesses investing in qualified combined heat and power (CHP) system property beginning in 2025.
Beth Van Duyne
Representative
TX-24
This bill establishes a new federal tax credit for businesses that install qualified Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system property. The credit is generally set at 10% of the property's cost, with potential increases for meeting domestic content or energy community requirements. To qualify, the CHP system must meet specific efficiency and output standards, and construction must begin after 2024.
This bill section establishes a brand-new tax credit aimed squarely at boosting industrial energy efficiency. Starting January 1, 2025, businesses that install certain highly efficient Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems can claim a significant tax break. The baseline credit is 10% of the system’s cost, and it’s layered onto the general business credit system. Think of CHP systems as super-efficient power plants for a factory or campus: they generate electricity and simultaneously capture the waste heat—like steam or hot water—for other uses, drastically cutting down on energy loss. This is all about getting more bang for your energy buck.
The real financial leverage comes from the bonus credits. If a company uses parts made primarily in the U.S. (the domestic content requirement), they get an extra 10 percentage points, bringing the credit up to 20%. If they install the system in an "energy community"—basically, an area historically dependent on fossil fuel production—they get another 10 points, pushing the total credit to a potential 30%. This structure is clearly designed to drive investment into specific technology and specific regions, linking industrial efficiency directly to supply chain development and regional economic transition.
Getting this credit isn’t as simple as buying a new generator; the system has to be a certified energy superstar. To qualify as "qualified combined heat and power system property," the unit must simultaneously produce both electrical or mechanical power and useful thermal energy (like steam for heating or industrial processes). Crucially, it must have an overall energy efficiency percentage greater than 60%. For perspective, many traditional power plants hover around 35-40% efficiency. This bill is targeting the best of the best.
There are also strict output minimums: at least 20% of the total useful energy must be thermal energy, and at least 20% must be electrical/mechanical power. This prevents businesses from getting the credit for systems that are mostly just heaters with a tiny generator attached. However, there’s a specific carve-out for systems that use biomass (plant matter or organic waste) for at least 90% of their fuel source. Those systems don't have to meet the 60% efficiency threshold, though the credit is scaled down proportionally if they fall short. This recognizes that biomass systems might not hit the same efficiency numbers but still provide environmental benefits.
While the credit is generous, it’s not for the absolute biggest players. The bill imposes capacity limits to focus the incentive on medium-to-large industrial users, not utility-scale operations. If a CHP system has a capacity over 50 megawatts (MW), it’s completely ineligible. For systems falling between 25 MW and 50 MW, the credit is reduced proportionately. For example, if a system is 30 MW, the credit is multiplied by 25/30, effectively shrinking the tax break. This means large manufacturers or university campuses that need massive power sources will see their credit capped or eliminated, while smaller industrial facilities are the primary targets.
What does this mean in the real world? For a food processing plant looking to cut its massive energy bills, installing a qualified CHP system could mean a 30% discount on that multi-million dollar investment, provided they source the equipment domestically and locate the project in a transition zone. This translates directly to lower operating costs and better energy stability. Conversely, if a company invests heavily in a system that just misses the 60% efficiency mark—say, it hits 59%—they get zero credit, demonstrating how crucial the technical specifications are when planning these projects.