PolicyBrief
H.R. 6751
119th CongressDec 16th 2025
Sunset for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill repeals the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act 240 days after enactment, citing its broad interpretation as inconsistent with Congress's war powers.

Pramila Jayapal
D

Pramila Jayapal

Representative

WA-7

LEGISLATION

Congress Moves to Sunset 2001 Military Force Authorization, Reclaiming War Powers in 240 Days

The bill, titled the "Sunset for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act," is straightforward: it repeals the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) 240 days after the bill becomes law. This AUMF, passed shortly after 9/11, has been the legal justification for countless U.S. military operations across the globe for over two decades. Congress explicitly finds that the broad, open-ended interpretation of the 2001 AUMF has been inconsistent with its constitutional power to declare war and make laws (SEC. 2).

The End of the Forever War Justification

For years, presidents from both parties have used the 2001 AUMF as a legal blank check to justify military action against groups that didn't even exist in 2001. Think of it like this: your employer gave you a credit card in 2001 for one specific work trip, but you've been using that same card for every single business expense, forever, without ever asking for a new budget. This bill is Congress finally cancelling that card.

This move is fundamentally about reasserting the separation of powers. By repealing the 2001 AUMF (SEC. 3), Congress is forcing the Executive Branch to come back and ask for specific, targeted authorization for any future military engagements. For the average person, this means a much higher level of accountability and transparency regarding where, why, and against whom the U.S. military is being deployed—and potentially fewer open-ended conflicts.

The 240-Day Clock

The repeal doesn't happen overnight; there is a 240-day transition period. This period is crucial because it gives the military and the White House time to figure out the legal justification for ongoing operations that currently rely on the 2001 AUMF. If the U.S. is currently conducting an operation in a country based solely on the 2001 AUMF, Congress will need to pass a new, specific authorization, or that operation loses its legal basis after the 240 days are up.

This transition period is where the rubber meets the road. While the intent is to restore constitutional balance, the practical challenge is ensuring that necessary, targeted military actions don't suddenly become legally ambiguous. The Executive Branch might use these eight months to push for a new, replacement AUMF that is just as broad, or Congress might fail to act, creating a temporary legal vacuum for operations that are deemed critical. Ultimately, this bill forces a necessary, overdue conversation about who gets to decide when and where the U.S. goes to war, shifting the power back toward the legislative branch as the Constitution intended.