This bill mandates the annual calculation and public reporting of each state's federal tax burden and federal spending outlays.
Bill Foster
Representative
IL-11
The Payer State Transparency Act of 2025 mandates the annual calculation of how much each state contributes to federal taxes and how much it receives in federal spending. These figures, detailing each state's federal tax burden and outlays, must be compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Office of Management and Budget. The resulting joint report must then be submitted to Congress and made publicly available online.
The Payer State Transparency Act of 2025 is straightforward: it forces the federal government to publicly calculate and report how much each state pays into the federal tax system versus how much it gets back in federal spending. Think of it as a mandatory annual audit of the country’s fiscal flow, broken down by state.
This isn't just about total dollars. The bill sets specific rules for how this money-in, money-out calculation must be done. The Secretary of Commerce (via the Bureau of Economic Analysis, or BEA) is tasked with figuring out the Federal Tax Burden for each state. If you pay federal taxes, your burden counts toward the state where you live. For businesses, it gets trickier: the tax burden is split among all the states where the business operates, proportional to the "amount of economic activity" it performs in each state. That "economic activity" part is where the rubber meets the road, as the bill doesn't precisely define it, leaving some room for interpretation by the BEA.
On the spending side—the Federal Outlays Calculation—the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) takes the lead. They have to calculate the total federal money received by each state. This includes contract awards, but those contracts also get divided up. If a federal contractor wins a big job, the money is counted as an outlay for the states where the actual work is performed, again split proportionally. This means a contract awarded to a company in Texas might count as an outlay for Arizona if the work is done there. This methodology aims to paint a clearer picture of where federal dollars ultimately land, rather than just where the checks are mailed.
These calculations must be performed annually, and the results are not meant to sit on a shelf. Section 3 requires the Secretary of Commerce and the OMB Director to submit a joint report to Congress within 180 days after the start of each calendar year. Crucially for the public, this report must also be published on a publicly accessible website run by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This ensures that the data—detailing the tax burden and outlays for all 50 states—is easily available to anyone who wants to look it up, from policymakers to the average citizen.
For regular people, this bill offers a significant boost in transparency. If you’ve ever wondered if your state is a "net payer" (paying more in taxes than it receives) or a "net recipient," this report will give you the official answer using a standardized methodology. This kind of data is gold for policy debates about everything from infrastructure funding to national defense spending, providing facts that can cut through political rhetoric.
The challenge, however, falls on the federal agencies and, potentially, businesses. Calculating a business's tax burden and dividing it based on "economic activity" across state lines is a massive, complex analytical task. For a large corporation operating in 30 states, tracking and verifying the economic activity in each state for tax allocation purposes could involve significant new administrative work. The vagueness around defining "economic activity" (Section 2) means the BEA will have to develop a clear, defensible methodology, and whatever they choose could face scrutiny. While the goal is transparency, the process of getting there will require serious resources and coordination between the BEA, OMB, and the Treasury Department.