PolicyBrief
H.R. 674
119th CongressJan 23rd 2025
Northeast Fisheries Heritage Protection Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill, the Northeast Fisheries Heritage Protection Act of 2025, bans commercial offshore wind energy development in Lobster Management Area 1 in the Gulf of Maine and requires a study on the environmental review processes for offshore wind projects.

Jared Golden
D

Jared Golden

Representative

ME-2

LEGISLATION

Offshore Wind Energy Blocked in Key Lobster Area, Feds to Study Gulf of Maine Impacts

The Northeast Fisheries Heritage Protection Act of 2025 puts a hard stop on any commercial offshore wind energy development in Lobster Management Area 1, a critical zone in the Gulf of Maine. This means no leases, licenses, or permits will be issued for wind farms in this specific area (SEC. 2). The bill also triggers a deep-dive study into the broader impacts of offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine, looking at everything from fish to air quality.

Hook, Line, and Impact

This bill essentially protects a major fishing ground from the immediate expansion of offshore wind energy. Lobster Management Area 1, as defined in federal regulations (50 CFR 697.18), is now off-limits to commercial wind developers. Think of it like drawing a line in the water – wind farms on one side, established lobster fishing grounds on the other. For lobstermen and other fishing businesses operating in this area, this offers a degree of certainty, at least for now. The immediate effect is that the area is protected, and business, ostensibly, continues as usual.

Diving Deeper: The Gulf of Maine Study

But the bill goes further than just a ban in Area 1. It also mandates a comprehensive study, due within 120 days, examining the environmental and economic ripple effects of any offshore wind development in the Gulf of Maine (SEC. 2). This isn't just a quick look-see; the Comptroller General has to consider a wide range of factors (SEC. 2):

  • Marine Life: Impacts on everything from whales and finfish to the tiny plankton at the bottom of the food chain.
  • Fishing Industry: Effects on both commercial and recreational fishing, and the businesses that depend on them.
  • Environment: Changes to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Cultural Resources: Impacts on historical, cultural, and Tribal sites.
  • Stakeholder Consultation: How the government decides who to consult about these projects.

For someone working in a coastal Maine town, this study could mean the difference between a thriving local economy and a struggling one. If you're a boat builder, a restaurant owner, or run a tourism business, the findings of this study could directly impact your livelihood. The study isn't just about the environment; it's about the economic health of the region, too.

The Bottom Line

While the bill protects a specific lobster fishing area, the mandated study acknowledges the bigger picture: balancing the push for renewable energy with the needs of existing industries and the environment. The real challenge will be in how this study's findings are used. It could pave the way for more informed decisions about offshore wind development, or it could become a tool for further delays. The 120-day deadline for the study keeps things moving, but the long-term consequences hinge on how the results are interpreted and applied. The bill highlights a core tension: how do we transition to cleaner energy sources without jeopardizing the livelihoods and ecosystems that already exist? It also prompts a critical question for similar situations across the country - how do we balance and prioritize competing interests in shared spaces?