PolicyBrief
H.R. 6698
119th CongressDec 12th 2025
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates the Chairman of the Board of Veterans' Appeals to report annually on the specific factors causing untimely dispositions and remands of veterans' appeals.

Keith Self
R

Keith Self

Representative

TX-3

LEGISLATION

BVA Transparency Bill Mandates Reporting on Why Veteran Appeals Get Delayed or Sent Back

If you’ve ever had to deal with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) appeals process, you know it can feel like a black hole. You submit your case, and then you wait—sometimes for years—without a clear answer on what’s causing the holdup. The Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025 aims to shine a serious light into that black hole by forcing the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) to report exactly why appeals are getting stuck or sent back for do-overs.

The Data Dive: Tracking Delays

This bill focuses squarely on accountability within the BVA’s new appeals system (established by the 2017 modernization act). Specifically, it targets two major pain points for veterans: untimely decisions and remands. Under Section 2, the Chairman of the BVA must now identify the factors contributing to any appeal case that wasn't decided in a timely manner by the end of the year. This isn't just a vague explanation; the report must detail the number and percentage of cases affected by each factor. Think of it like this: instead of the BVA just saying, "We had delays," they’ll have to report, "X% of cases were delayed because we were waiting on outside medical records," or "Y% were delayed because of staffing shortages in a specific regional office." This level of detail is crucial because it turns a general problem into a specific, fixable issue.

Why Did My Appeal Get Sent Back?

Remands are another major frustration. A remand is when the BVA sends an appeal back down to a lower level (like a regional office) because they need more evidence or corrected paperwork. It basically means you have to start a significant portion of the process over again. The bill mandates the same detailed reporting for remands: the Chairman must identify the factors contributing to these remands and report the number and percentage of cases affected. If, for example, 30% of remands happen because the initial VA examiner failed to ask the right questions, that data is now public. This allows Congress and advocacy groups to pinpoint the exact training or procedural failures that are costing veterans months or years of waiting time.

What This Means for Veterans and Taxpayers

For the veteran waiting on their disability decision, this bill won’t instantly speed up their case, but it creates the mechanism to fix the system that’s slowing them down. Right now, the BVA has an administrative burden—they have to spend time compiling this detailed data—but the payoff is significant. When you know why the system is failing, you can actually design a targeted solution. If the data shows that a few specific factors are causing the vast majority of delays and remands, that’s where resources and reforms need to be directed. Essentially, this is a transparency measure designed to force better performance and streamline a notoriously slow bureaucratic process, turning anecdotal evidence of delays into hard, actionable data.