This Act mandates comprehensive financial transparency for college programs by enhancing the College Scorecard with detailed cost and outcome data and establishing a Universal Net Price Calculator for personalized estimates.
Brett Guthrie
Representative
KY-2
The Student Financial Clarity Act of 2025 aims to dramatically increase transparency in college costs for consumers. It mandates the publication of detailed, program-specific financial data on the College Scorecard website, broken down by student demographics. Furthermore, the bill establishes a Universal Net Price Calculator to provide personalized cost estimates for prospective students. These changes are designed to help students better understand the true net price of specific programs before enrolling.
This legislation, the Student Financial Clarity Act of 2025, is a major overhaul of how colleges must disclose financial information to prospective students. Simply put, it forces schools and the Department of Education to pull back the curtain on the true cost of a degree. The core changes are twofold: creating a new, standardized Universal Net Price Calculator and requiring colleges to report cost and outcome data broken down by specific academic program, effective starting the 2027-2028 award year.
Ever tried to figure out the real cost of college using those clunky, school-specific calculators? They often feel like guessing games. This bill aims to fix that by requiring the Department of Education to build a single, Universal Net Price Calculator on a dedicated website within 18 months. This tool will allow users to compare programs across different colleges and get personalized estimates of the “Net Price Required for Completion”—that’s the total cost of tuition and fees minus any grants or scholarships you don’t have to pay back (Section 2).
Crucially, this calculator will pull data from the FAFSA and other Federal aid sources, providing a much more accurate, personalized estimate based on the average costs for students in similar financial situations. For a parent budgeting for their high school junior, this means they can finally get an apples-to-apples comparison of what two different nursing programs at two different schools might actually cost them out-of-pocket, including projected cost increases. The bill even eliminates the older, less comprehensive Early Estimator tool, signaling a major transition to this new standardized system.
Perhaps the biggest administrative shift for colleges is the requirement to stop reporting generalized institutional costs and instead calculate and disclose costs for each program of study (Section 3). Previously, a university might report one average cost of attendance. Under this Act, the school must define a “program of study” by its specific CIP code (like Electrical Engineering vs. History) and credential level (Bachelor’s vs. Master’s).
This means the reported cost of a two-year welding certificate program must be distinct from the cost of a four-year liberal arts degree at the same institution. This level of granularity is a massive win for transparency. If you’re considering a career change and looking at a specialized post-baccalaureate certificate, you won't have to wade through the average costs of the entire student body to figure out your specific financial commitment. Colleges will face a significant administrative lift to track and report this data, but the result is far clearer consumer information.
To make all this new data accessible, the bill mandates a massive upgrade to the College Scorecard website within 18 months. The Scorecard will now publish detailed financial and outcome data not just for the college as a whole, but broken down by specific program of study and key student demographics (Section 2). This includes completion rates, time to credential, total net price, student loan repayment rates, and even “value-added earnings” for both completers and non-completers.
Imagine comparing two different business programs: you could see that students from Program A have a median net price of $25,000 and average post-graduation earnings of $65,000, while Program B has a median net price of $35,000 but average earnings of $80,000. This data must also be broken down by factors like household income and race/ethnicity, providing unprecedented insight into which programs deliver value for which students. For anyone trying to maximize their ROI on a degree, this level of detail is invaluable for making a smart, data-driven choice.