This bill imposes sanctions and visa restrictions on Chinese individuals and entities significantly involved in the theft of U.S. intellectual property.
Mike Kennedy
Representative
UT-3
The Combatting Chinas Pilfering of Intellectual Property Act (CCP IP Act) imposes sanctions on Chinese individuals and entities significantly involved in the theft of U.S. intellectual property. It mandates asset blocking and immigration bans for sanctioned parties. Additionally, the bill restricts U.S. visa issuance for senior Chinese Communist Party officials and military personnel, with a potential waiver based on presidential certification regarding China's IP practices.
This legislation, titled the "Combatting China's Pilfering of Intellectual Property Act" (or the "CCP IP Act"), is a direct attempt to curb intellectual property (IP) theft from U.S. companies and individuals. It does this by creating a two-pronged system of sanctions and visa restrictions aimed at specific Chinese individuals and entities. Essentially, the bill says if you’re stealing U.S. IP, you’ll lose access to U.S. assets and the U.S. itself.
The first major action in this bill is the imposition of sanctions on anyone operating in China’s economy who is found to have engaged in a "pattern of significant theft" of a U.S. person's IP, or who received IP stolen by others (SEC. 2). This determination is left up to the President, giving the Executive Branch significant power to decide who gets targeted. If the President determines someone meets this criteria—whether a Chinese national or an entity organized under Chinese law—the sanctions are immediate and severe.
First, all property and interests in property of that sanctioned person that are in the U.S. or come under U.S. control must be blocked—a total asset freeze. Second, any sanctioned individual is immediately banned from entering the U.S., their visa is revoked, and they become permanently ineligible for any future visa or entry documentation. For U.S. companies, this means you need to be very careful if you’re doing business with any entity that might land on this sanctions list, as your dealings with them could suddenly become illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The second part of the bill restricts visas for a broad swath of high-ranking Chinese officials and their families (SEC. 3). The Secretary of State cannot issue a visa to, and the Secretary of Homeland Security must deny entry to, senior officials in the Chinese Communist Party (including the Politburo and Central Committee), members of the Chinese cabinet, and active duty members of the People's Liberation Army. Crucially, this restriction also extends to the spouses and children of those senior officials. This is a wide net that targets family members who may have no involvement in IP theft but who are caught up solely due to their relationship with a restricted official.
This section essentially uses U.S. travel access as a diplomatic tool. The only way these restrictions lift is if the President certifies to Congress that the Chinese government has stopped sponsoring, funding, and actively working to infringe on U.S. IP rights. This puts the burden on the Chinese government to change its behavior before these officials and their families can travel to the U.S.
While the goal of protecting U.S. IP is clear, the bill relies heavily on the President's discretion. The President can waive sanctions for any person if it's deemed to be in the U.S. national security interest, provided they justify it to Congress. Conversely, the power to define a "pattern of significant theft" is also highly subjective. This level of executive authority means the actual impact of this bill could shift significantly depending on the administration in power and the geopolitical climate.
For regular folks, the impact is less direct but still important. If you work for a U.S. company that relies on proprietary technology, this bill is intended to protect your company's edge and, by extension, your job. However, if your business relies on complex international supply chains or investment from China, the sudden asset blocking power could introduce significant regulatory risk. The bill attempts to cut through the bureaucratic noise by focusing on real penalties, but its effectiveness will depend entirely on how the White House chooses to wield the broad powers it grants.