This act removes the priority requirement for out-of-school youth when local workforce boards allocate youth workforce investment funds.
David Taylor
Representative
OH-2
The Workforce Flexibility Act amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to remove the requirement for local workforce development boards to prioritize out-of-school youth when allocating youth workforce investment funds. This change grants greater flexibility in how these funds are distributed for youth employment initiatives.
The new Workforce Flexibility Act is short, but it packs a punch by tweaking how local job training funds are distributed to young people. Specifically, Section 2 of this bill amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) by dropping the requirement that local workforce development boards must give priority to "out-of-school youth" when spending youth workforce investment funds. Essentially, it removes a statutory mandate that ensured a specific, often vulnerable, group of young people received the first access to job training and support services.
Under the current system, if you’re a young person not currently enrolled in school—maybe you dropped out, finished your GED, or are just trying to find your first job—you had a guaranteed seat at the table for WIOA-funded programs. This bill changes that by eliminating that priority. The funding pot for youth training remains, but local boards now have full discretion over who gets the money. Instead of being legally required to prioritize the disconnected youth population, local boards can now equally consider those still in school or other demographics defined as 'youth' under WIOA.
For local workforce development boards, this change is all about flexibility. They argue that local needs vary widely; in some areas, the biggest challenge might be getting high school students into internships, not necessarily focusing on dropouts. By removing the priority, the boards gain the freedom to redirect funds where they see the most immediate local need, which is the intended benefit of the bill. However, this flexibility comes at a cost. The original priority was a safety net designed to ensure that the most vulnerable youth—those facing the biggest barriers to employment and who are not connected to the school system—didn't get overlooked. If a local board decides to focus its limited funds on, say, summer jobs for high-achieving high school students, the out-of-school population could see their essential job readiness, mentorship, and training programs significantly reduced or even eliminated. This shift means that a population that already struggles with access to resources now has to compete for funds that were previously earmarked specifically for them.