This act amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to clarify the definition of "State" within the SNAP program to explicitly include both urban and rural parts of Hawaii.
Jill Tokuda
Representative
HI-2
The Feeding Rural Families Act of 2025 amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to clarify the definition of "State" within the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This change specifically ensures that both the urban and rural parts of Hawaii are explicitly included under the SNAP definition.
The “Feeding Rural Families Act of 2025” is a piece of legislation that sounds broad, but its current text focuses on one extremely specific administrative tweak to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. Specifically, it amends Section 3(u)(2) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to clarify the definition of “State” when referring to Hawaii. The bill adds the phrase “urban and rural parts of” before every mention of Hawaii in that section, ensuring that the statutory language explicitly covers all areas of the state for SNAP purposes.
For most people outside of Hawaii, this change will be completely invisible. But for the folks administering the SNAP program—and potentially for families living in remote areas of the islands—this is a cleanup job that matters. Federal law often uses technical definitions that can lead to bureaucratic confusion down the line. By explicitly adding “urban and rural parts of” to the definition (Sec. 2), the bill removes any possible ambiguity about whether SNAP funding, rules, and administrative duties apply equally to a family in downtown Honolulu and a family on a remote farm on the Big Island.
Think of this as plugging a small hole in the legal wall. While SNAP benefits have always been intended for eligible families across the entire state, leaving the definition slightly vague can create headaches for state administrators trying to allocate resources or prove compliance to the federal government. For a busy SNAP office worker in Hawaii, this clarification means less time spent arguing over statutory interpretation and more time processing applications. For a family relying on food assistance in a rural community, this ensures that their access to the program is unequivocally covered by the federal definition, preventing potential program delays or funding disputes that could impact local services.
It’s important to note what this bill doesn’t do: it doesn't change eligibility requirements, increase benefit amounts, or expand the program to new groups. This is a purely technical, administrative amendment. It clarifies the geographic scope of the SNAP definition for Hawaii, ensuring that the federal government’s intent—that the program covers the entire state—is crystal clear in the statute. This kind of legislative housekeeping is often necessary to keep large federal programs running smoothly and prevent legal challenges based on overly narrow readings of the law.