PolicyBrief
H.R. 6365
119th CongressJan 22nd 2026
Wintergreen Emergency Egress Act
AWAITING HOUSE

This act mandates the Secretary of the Interior to issue a specific emergency egress right-of-way on the Blue Ridge Parkway near Milepost 9.6 upon certification that alternatives have been evaluated, fire ecology analyzed, and necessary environmental reviews completed.

John McGuire
R

John McGuire

Representative

VA-5

LEGISLATION

Proposed Emergency Egress on Blue Ridge Parkway Mandated, But Only After Fire Ecology and NEPA Reviews Are Complete

The newly introduced Wintergreen Emergency Egress Act aims to solve a critical safety issue by mandating the creation of a specific emergency exit route, or “egress,” near Milepost 9.6 on the Blue Ridge Parkway. Essentially, this bill tells the Secretary of the Interior, “You must issue the right-of-way for this specific proposed road,” which is detailed on a map titled “Blue Ridge Parkway, Proposed Wintergreen Emergency Egress Near Milepost 9.6,” dated September 2024.

Safety First, But With Conditions Attached

While the goal is to improve safety by creating a defined emergency exit, the bill doesn't just grant a blanket approval. It sets up three non-negotiable hurdles the Secretary must clear before the right-of-way can be issued. Think of it like getting a building permit: the project is approved in concept, but you still have to prove you meet all the safety codes. The Secretary must formally certify that these three conditions are met, which gives the Interior Department significant control over the timeline and depth of the reviews.

The Three Mandatory Checks

First, the Secretary must complete an evaluation of alternative egress routes that do not cross Federal land. This includes checking if existing trails can simply be converted into roads. This is a crucial step for preservationists and conservation groups, as it forces the government to prove that using this specific piece of Federal land is truly the last resort, rather than the first choice. If an existing trail outside the parkway boundaries could be upgraded, the rationale for cutting into the Federal land route weakens.

Second, there must be an analysis of expected fire ecology behavior for the proposed route in the event of a fire emergency. This means experts need to model how a wildfire would behave around this new road and how the road itself might affect firefighting efforts or evacuation safety. For residents and visitors in the Wintergreen area, this analysis is vital, as it directly addresses the very emergencies the road is meant to solve.

Finally, the Secretary must ensure that any required reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and other relevant laws are completed. NEPA requires Federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of their proposed actions before making decisions. For a project on Federal land like the Blue Ridge Parkway, this involves studying impacts on wildlife, water, and local ecosystems. The bill requires these reviews to be finished, which is the standard safeguard against poorly planned infrastructure projects.

The Real-World Trade-Off

This bill attempts to balance a clear need for improved emergency access—a huge benefit for anyone who lives, works, or vacations near this busy section of the Parkway—with necessary environmental oversight. The mandate to issue the right-of-way is powerful, but it’s entirely chained to the completion of these three specific, high-stakes requirements. The vagueness lies in the Secretary's power to “certify” when these complex studies are officially “complete.” This could mean the difference between a thorough, multi-year environmental review and a rushed analysis designed simply to greenlight the mandated construction. For those who value the preservation of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the quality of the required environmental and fire ecology studies will be the most important part of this entire process.