PolicyBrief
H.R. 6304
119th CongressNov 25th 2025
AI for America Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill mandates federal agencies to develop an AI action plan, identify regulatory barriers to AI adoption, and requires NIST to report on mitigating security risks and ideological bias in artificial intelligence systems.

Jennifer Kiggans
R

Jennifer Kiggans

Representative

VA-2

LEGISLATION

New AI Bill Mandates Federal Action Plan by 2027, Targets Regulatory Roadblocks in Healthcare and Transportation

The new "AI for America Act" is essentially the federal government hitting the 'pause and plan' button on artificial intelligence. It doesn't drop any new regulations on you or your business today, but it sets the stage for how the government plans to manage AI over the next few years. Think of it as a massive, mandatory homework assignment for every major federal agency, ensuring they actually have a strategy for the AI revolution instead of just winging it.

The Federal Government’s AI To-Do List

This bill tasks the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) with creating a comprehensive national action plan for AI by July 31, 2027. That’s a long runway, but the plan itself has to cover some big-ticket items: how to build up the AI workforce, how to manage security risks, and how to address “ideological bias” in AI systems. For anyone working in tech or manufacturing, this plan could eventually dictate how federal funding flows for AI research and development, and which skills the government prioritizes in its training programs. It’s a blueprint for the future of federal AI investment.

Clearing the Bureaucratic Traffic Jams

One of the most immediate and practical parts of this bill is the mandate to identify regulatory barriers. Within one year, the OSTP must pinpoint every rule and regulation currently clogging the pipes for AI adoption in key sectors like healthcare, scientific research, and transportation. If you’re a startup trying to use AI to speed up drug discovery, or a trucking company exploring autonomous fleet management, this section is huge. The goal is to find the rules that were written for the analog world and figure out how to update them so beneficial AI can actually be used without getting tangled in red tape. This could mean faster approvals for AI-driven medical devices or clearer rules for self-driving vehicle testing.

Tackling Bias and Security Head-On

Perhaps the most interesting mandate falls to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST is required to report on how to detect and prevent two major AI pitfalls: security risks and ideological bias. This isn't just about making sure AI doesn't get hacked; it’s about making sure the data used to train the AI isn't inherently unfair or discriminatory. The bill specifically mentions using internal review protocols, third-party audits, and public disclosure requirements to tackle this. For the average person, this means the government is serious about ensuring that AI systems used in areas like loan applications or hiring—or even federal benefit decisions—aren't silently perpetuating old biases. The challenge here is that “ideological bias” is a notoriously difficult and subjective term to define, which could make the implementation of this report tricky, but the intent is to push for fairer systems.

What This Means for You

While this bill is heavy on reports and plans, its impact is long-term and foundational. It means the federal government is finally trying to get its act together on AI. If you work in a regulated industry, expect to see the rules around AI start to clarify over the next few years, potentially opening up new opportunities. If you use services that rely on AI, the push for security and bias detection should, theoretically, lead to more reliable and equitable outcomes down the road. It’s a necessary step toward managing a technology that’s already changing how we work, travel, and access healthcare.