PolicyBrief
H.R. 5994
119th CongressNov 10th 2025
Every Veteran Counts Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Every Veteran Counts Act of 2025 mandates the VA to collect, maintain, and publicly share comprehensive, anonymized demographic data on veterans while requiring a detailed report on the agency's overall data strategy implementation.

Julia Brownley
D

Julia Brownley

Representative

CA-26

LEGISLATION

VA Mandated to Collect Detailed Veteran Data, Including Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation, for Public Database

The Every Veteran Counts Act of 2025 is essentially a massive upgrade for how the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) tracks and understands the 19 million veterans it serves. Think of it as forcing the VA to finally ditch the old flip phone and buy a smartphone capable of handling modern data. The core mandate, laid out in Section 3, requires the VA to start collecting and maintaining a comprehensive database of veteran demographics.

This isn't just about age and service history anymore. The bill specifically mandates collecting detailed information on gender identity (broken down into categories like cisgender, transgender, gender diverse, and nonbinary), sexual orientation (heterosexual, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer), and housing status (renter, homeowner, etc.). The VA also has to record whether a veteran was exposed to environmental hazards, military sexual trauma, or dead/wounded people during service. Crucially, this data must then be anonymized, made machine-readable, and published on a publicly accessible VA website, updated at least once a year.

The Data Deep Dive: Why It Matters to You

For most people, data collection sounds like bureaucratic paperwork. But for veterans, this level of detail is a game-changer for service quality. Right now, VA services are sometimes based on data that is over a decade old or too generalized to target specific needs effectively. For instance, if you are a female veteran living in a rural area who needs mental health support related to military sexual trauma (MST), the current system often struggles to pinpoint exactly where those resources are most needed or how many people actually fit that profile.

This new mandate forces the VA to see the veteran population with high-definition clarity. By collecting data on specific demographics like gender identity and sexual orientation, the VA and Congress will finally have the evidence needed to ensure outreach programs are reaching historically underserved or invisible veteran groups. If the data shows a high concentration of nonbinary veterans in Texas are struggling to access care due to distance, policymakers can use that specific, current information to justify opening a new clinic or expanding telehealth services in that region. It makes the case for funding and tailored programs undeniable.

Accountability by the Numbers

Beyond the demographic database, Section 4 requires the VA Secretary to submit an annual, detailed report to Congress on the progress of the VA's entire data strategy. This report is a full performance review, covering everything from how the VA is managing its data as a “strategic asset” to its progress in ensuring data quality and cataloging its assets. It also requires the VA to discuss its current risk assessments concerning data breaches and information security—a critical check given the sensitive nature of the information being collected.

This reporting requirement is designed to mature the VA's data practices, pushing it toward the standards set by the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act. Essentially, Congress is telling the VA: Don't just collect the data; prove that you are using it responsibly, securely, and effectively to make better decisions. For veterans and taxpayers, this means a better chance that services are efficient and based on actual, current need, rather than guesswork or outdated surveys.

The Privacy Trade-Off

Any time the government collects highly sensitive personal data—especially regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and trauma history—privacy is the immediate concern. The bill attempts to address this by explicitly requiring that the data be anonymized before publication to prevent the release of sensitive personal information. The challenge, and where the VA must get it right, is ensuring that the anonymization process is robust enough to prevent re-identification, especially when combining many specific demographic data points (e.g., a nonbinary, formerly homeless veteran who served in a specific combat theater).

If implemented correctly, this Act promises to deliver a massive leap forward in transparency and evidence-based policy for veterans. It forces the VA to modernize its understanding of the people it serves and gives Congress and advocacy groups the hard numbers they need to fight for targeted resources. It’s a clear win for making sure that service decisions are based on data that reflects the reality of the 21st-century veteran.